Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

For the past few days, the Indigenous arts community has been reeling from the shock of another high-profile arts professional who has made inconsistent statements about their background. Last time, it was the Joseph Boyden storm that rocked Indigenous literary arts, and this time, Michelle Latimer, director of Trickster and Inconvenient Indian, is being called upon to address the ambiguity in her claims to Indigeneity over the years.

Community members are taking to Twitter and Facebook to openly discuss how they feel this is another example of a white settler acquiring fame and financial gain by securing funding meant for Indigenous peoples in the arts. People are asking: How could this happen? How could someone have taken up so much space for so long with no accountability?

Michelle Latimer resigns from CBC’s Trickster after addressing questions of Indigenous ancestry

Michelle Latimer’s contentious claim of Indigenous ancestry has understandably angered our community

Michelle Latimer wore a cloak of Indigeneity. What we need are authentic leaders

As an Anishinabekwe artist and visual anthropologist, I have an intimate relationship with the long-standing history between Indigenous arts and colonialism. It was through art that non-Indigenous peoples first gained access to Indigenous peoples. They used Indigenous art to bolster problematic theories of human development and civilization that placed the Indigenous peoples, whose art least resembled Western art, at the bottom of the evolutionary ladder. At the same time, Western artists misappropriated Indigenous cultures, including their art forms, in the creation of films, photographs and other visual masterpieces that grossly misrepresented Indigenous cultures and/or buried aesthetics born out of Indigenous artistic and intellectual traditions within their modernist expressions.

Story continues below advertisement

This exploitation continues to happen in both the art world and academia, and while it is ethically fraught, it makes perfect sense to those who are guilty of it. It makes sense because it follows the logic of settler colonialism – that anything belonging to Indigenous peoples, their identity, their art or their land, may be mined and extracted from in order to produce some sort of economic or intellectual benefit. The logic is that once someone stumbles upon or “discovers” some aspect of Indigenous being, it is appropriate to stake claim and take ... and take ... and take more. And this has always been a direct assault against Indigenous sovereignty. Sovereignty over land, body and story.

This is why Indigenous creatives including film directors, producers and actors are so important. A director is gifted with the responsibility of helping share Indigenous stories with the public. They are not simply collecting and telling other people’s stories. Rather, they are making choices that ultimately reflect their own relationship with what has been shared with them. So when an Indigenous person chooses to entrust their stories to an Indigenous writer or director, they often do so because they believe that the individual has the lived experience, cultural values and tools to hold these stories as their relatives, with utmost care and respect. They have faith that the person has the cultural intelligence and also intuition to enter into meaningful and careful relationships with their stories and thus make good choices that will lead to positive outcomes for our families, communities and respective nations. When this happens, it is a powerful act of Indigenous visual sovereignty because not only are Indigenous stories made visible, they are made visible in a way that reaffirms and strengthens our kinship and social relations.

These trusting and intimate relationships in Indigenous arts have been so important to reclaiming and exercising Indigenous sovereignty, and so when individuals enter into a relationship with Indigenous peoples and their stories under misleading pretenses, it undermines the important work that so many have struggled to make possible.

Some of my non-Indigenous friends have asked me whether they should continue to support the show Trickster in light of what has happened. My response to them has been, yes! Watch and witness the brilliance and beauty of the characters and their stories and connect them to the talented literary artist who birthed these ideas and stories into existence. Learn more about the identities and backgrounds of the Indigenous community members who made this production possible – where they come from and the communities and nations that claim them. When these kinds of truths are prioritized and placed front and centre, it will make it much more difficult, if not pointless, for someone to try to hide in, and benefit from, the cracks of uncertainty for so long.

Dr. Celeste Pedri-Spade is an associate professor of Indigenous Studies at Queen’s University.

The Globe has five brand-new arts and lifestyle newsletters: Health & Wellness, Parenting & Relationships, Sightseer, Nestruck on Theatre and What to Watch. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies