Skip to main content

Vancouver-based multidisciplinary artist Sharona Franklin, seen here in a picture from her Instagram page, was pitched by Gucci for her jelly art creations.

Rashelle Campbell/Handout

Growing up in Lumby, B.C., Sharona Franklin decorated her bedroom with photos from glossy fashion magazines and dreamed about working in fashion. So when a controversy erupted this month over a dispute with an international design house, her family couldn’t help but note the irony.

“My little sister, she called me and said: ‘It’s so weird because you had Gucci stuff on your walls,’” Franklin recalled this week.

Weird is one word for what has happened. Franklin, who now lives in social housing on Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside, is a 32-year-old multidisciplinary artist who makes edible art: laborious and intricate Jell-O mould-type creations. She has an Instagram account where she showcases the jelly art. In May, she said, she was contacted by a design firm in London asking if she would be interested in creating work for a “large Italian fashion house" – Gucci, as it turns out. Franklin signed a non-disclosure agreement, and e-mails were sent back and forth. There was a discussion about when she could fly to Italy. She said she told them about the supplies she uses and offered some information about how she makes the pieces.

Story continues below advertisement

Then, silence. Following inquiries from Franklin, the London design firm, Simmonds Ltd., told her that due to budget constraints, they were going to go with someone in Europe instead, indicating that they had been speaking to a few people about the jelly concept.

“We didn’t discuss a budget,” Franklin said this week. “I kind of trusted them.”

A picture from Franklin's Instagram account, where she showcases the jelly art.

Handout

When the Gucci 2020 Cruise campaign emerged, Franklin started hearing from friends and curators about the similarities between the images the luxury brand was using and her own jelly art.

But Franklin didn’t think there was anything she could do, especially since she had signed the NDA. “I just felt really defeated and confused by it. I just didn’t understand why they didn’t hire me if they wanted that look.”

Other people began posting about it, calling out Gucci. A childhood friend and another Vancouver-based artist started a change.org petition titled “Get GUCCI to make amends with Disabled Creatives and for plagiarizing Sharona!” The petition alleges “targeted theft of a disabled artist.”

As of Wednesday, it had more than 3,300 signatures.

In May, Franklin says she was contacted through Instagram by a design firm in London asking if she would be interested in creating work for a 'large Italian fashion house' – Gucci, as it turns out.

Particularly galling to Franklin is Gucci’s Changemakers campaign, meant to promote diversity in the industry. Franklin says diversity should go beyond skin colour.

Story continues below advertisement

Born in Vernon, B.C., Franklin suffers from a number of conditions, including juvenile idiopathic arthritis. When she was about 18, she moved to Vancouver so she could access services at the acclaimed GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre. She now lives on disability payments and says she receives daily antibody injections and a weekly low-grade dose of chemotherapy.

Since the controversy came to light, she said, she has heard from several lawyers who have offered to represent her pro bono. As of Wednesday, she had not heard from Gucci.

In an e-mailed statement to The Globe and Mail, Gucci says it has used brightly coloured jellies by different artists and chefs in the past.

“Each selection process … consists of a series of phases before an artist is chosen for a collaboration. We do not always proceed with every artist we approach for consideration. … We nonetheless have the highest respect and appreciation for the creativity of all of the artists we consider, even if they are not selected for a collaboration.”

Live your best. We have a daily Life & Arts newsletter, providing you with our latest stories on health, travel, food and culture. Sign up today.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies