Skip to main content

In the Massey Murder, Charlotte Gray tackles a criminal case for the first time.

MICHELLE VALBERG

Title
The Massey Murder
Author
Charlotte Gray
Genre
Nonfiction
Publisher
HarperCollins Canada
Pages
320
Price
$33.99

In February, 1915, six months into the world's greatest conflict, Toronto became gripped with a local drama: A British maid, Carrie Davies, shot and killed her employer, a member of the prominent Massey family. Reported on the front pages of the city's six newspapers, the case quickly became a national story, eclipsing war coverage. The trial and its extraordinary outcome are worth remembering, as apparent from Charlotte Gray's engaging new book, The Massey Murder.

A bestselling biographer and social historian, Gray tackles a criminal case for the first time. She has previously told us about prominent people (Alexander Bell) and major events such as the Yukon Gold Rush. But the 18-year-old maid at the centre of this book was one of thousands of domestics employed in Toronto households. Davies's personal papers (if there were any) did not survive, but the book is not about her obscure life. Gray's book tells a larger story about her trial and Canadian society of a century ago. It transports the reader to Toronto during its industrial boom: "This book is a story about Toronto in the early 20th century, a fast-changing and divided community in the process of reinvention, and about Canada as it embarked on a century of dramatic evolution."

The victim, Charles Albert (Bert) Massey, was a grandson of the pioneering industrialist whose name "was stamped on Toronto's largest factory, on millions of pieces of agricultural machinery" he designed. Hart Massey's implements transformed Canadian agriculture as early as the 19th century and were shipped to markets from South America to the Middle East. But the grandson inherited neither his family's ambition nor fortune: He sold cars at the Studebaker dealership.

Story continues below advertisement

In the days when cars were assembled with American parts in Walkerville, near Windsor, and newspapers thrived, Toronto had three morning and three evening papers. The Evening Telegram, voice of the working masses, and the Toronto Daily Star, representing capitalist interests, vied for circulation. The Massey name, an implication of sex scandal and a violent crime gave the case instant publicity. Davies became a celebrity when the rival publications began to print opposing accounts of what happened and who "the real victim" was.

The newspapers had plenty to speculate about. Davies shot her unsuspecting and unarmed master outside his house. Although she claimed self-defence, there was no physical assault and no rape. If found guilty of murder, Davies could be sent to the gallows; a verdict of manslaughter could earn life imprisonment. So her case received enormous attention: Crowds even attended pretrial hearings. What is more, popular sympathy sided with the servant.

It was an open secret of the day. Domestic servants, usually young female immigrants, were vulnerable to sexual abuse; when dismissed, many ended up on the streets. But Davies, whose sister lived in Toronto, was better off. The only servant in a small household of three, she was paid $14 to $16 a month, which translates into $1,400 in today's funds, an average salary for modern live-in Canadian nannies. (Gray's claim that Davies received "meagre" wages and was overworked is unconvincing.) In fact, Davies was well treated until one day, with his wife absent, her master tried to seduce her.

One of Toronto's most eminent courtroom lawyers, Hartley Dewart, represented Davies pro bono. To prove a near-impossible claim of self-defence, Dewart produced a strong narrative with his client's virginity at its centre. Canada was still influenced by Victorian morality and an unmarried woman's "sexual innocence was as good as an alibi." Dewart exploited contemporary bias to the full; he also assured selection of middle-aged and conservative jurymen.

Detailed newspaper accounts convey the heightened atmosphere of the trial and Dewart's theatrical defence, reminiscent of Richard Gere's virtuoso performance in Chicago. Dewart "razzle-dazzled" the jury with patriotic war rhetoric, describing the British maid as loyal to her sweetheart soldier fighting in France, and a near-heroine. In contrast, Massey's attempted rape and a lewd sexual proposition to a virgin allowed his character assassination. As the lawyer told the "spellbound" jury, "It was not manslaughter, it was brute slaughter." It took the jury only 30 minutes to acquit Davies of her murder charge, a verdict met with a "tremendous cheer" from the gallery. But the day after, The New York Times ran a sobering article, "Unwritten Law in Canada," describing the result as unprecedented in Canadian jurisprudence.

The case did not influence future trials, since "no decision was made on a point of law." But today it exposes Toronto's entire societal assumptions about class and gender. The Toronto of 1915 had two separate justice systems. "The weaker sex," believed incapable of serious crime, was treated almost like youth offenders today.

Gray has written a social history and a historical drama: Her book even opens with a "list of characters." But Gray's cast involves meticulously researched historical figures, whose behaviour she depicts with psychological insight. Narrated with a great sense of presence, irony, and verve, this book recreates a vanished world of Canadian jurisprudence and politics, invests it with life, and makes it memorable.

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter