Skip to main content

Author Amy Tan

ANTHONY JENKINS/The Globe and Mail

Amy Tan's The Joy Luck Club established her as a bestselling author in 1989. Since then, she has written five novels, including her most recent, The Valley of Amazement. Here, she reflects on the influences that have shaped her as a writer.

When you started to write, which writers did you revere?

I read a lot of Amy Hempel, Eudora Welty, Richard Ford, Flannery O'Connor, John Cheever, Raymond Carver.

Story continues below advertisement

Did you imitate any of them?

When I was in college the first year that I switched to be an English major, I tried to write like Tennessee Williams. That was about the only time I really imitated in a voice, using that vernacular. But I tried to imitate what I imagined to be a New Yorkerish type of story. And none of the characters were Chinese. I sent it to a friend who had a friend at a literary magazine and the comment came back, "Somehow, it didn't feel authentic." I didn't know what that meant, but I said, "Oh, just give it up, you're never going to be published, just write what you want."

Which perhaps unexpected book(s) share a commonality your new one? What would you think of as its distant cousins?

By subject matter, people have said, Memoirs of a Geisha, and I can see that very clearly… I'm not elevating myself to the level of classics like Anna Karenina or Madame Bovary but to me, it has more in common with stories about women like that who had, they thought, a certain destiny and they could make choices and that it would lead their way, and it led to mistakes.

Who do you wish were more influential?

I have a friend who is a wonderful writer and his work is read in Europe but not really here. I think, why is that, that we have a cultural divide in literary appreciation? Is it because he's from Lebanon and he writes about war and the Middle East? So I would love to have a writer that is more widely embraced by people universally. And perhaps people would say Khaled Hosseini is the one who unifies people the most, because he is read, actually, all around the world.

Whose sentences are your favourite, and why?

Story continues below advertisement

I love Richard Ford's sentences. They seem so casual. In one respect, they sound as if he's simply thinking aloud, working it out. Contemplating. And it comes out and it has a deep sense of familiarity in all parts of it, so you think the story is about him, but it can't be. I love the sentences in Louise Erdrich's books. They have a power to them, in many voices – she can write so many different voices. Nabokov, of course. Read it just for sentences: Lolita. One of my favourite lines is his parenthetical remark "picnic, lightning." I love that line because the imagery is huge in those two short words. Also the sense of this very repressed person talking about one of the most traumatic moments of his life, and the parentheses means, so unaware. All contained in two words in parentheses. I love that. I love the sentences of Jamaica Kincaid and also Amy Hempel. I think what I like is sentences that start out not being very ornate – exception of Nabokov – and rope you in. They seem to be calm on the surface and they have a lot of energy and even violence underneath.

When you are in a period of writing, do you change your reading habits for fear of being unintentionally influenced?

If I were to read a voice I really loved, I would be in trouble. That voice would seep into me. And it would either make me want to be that voice, or I would suddenly be unmoored and feel that I shouldn't be writing.

It's not just the language of it. Some stories, there's a sense of importance. I remember when I read [J.M. Coetzee's] Disgrace, I felt, why should I write? People should all just read these books.

This interview has been condensed and edited.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter