Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

It's Our Turn To Eat is about corruption in Kenya. The title quotes the appeal his ethnic peers made to John Githongo - the man they had appointed as presidential adviser on corruption - not to betray their collective interests by failing to do that job properly.

The election of a reforming government in late 2002 had raised high expectations of change in that most distinctive characteristic of Kenya's political culture: corruption. It was expected that past scandals would be investigated and resolved and the first steps taken in preventing future corruption.

  • It's Our Turn to Eat: The Story of a Kenyan Whistleblower, by Michela Wrong, Fourth Estate, 354 pages, $24.95


At last, evidence emerged that seemed strong enough to sustain action. Inquiries in these years began to inform us all on the Goldenberg scandal - the definitive scandal of the Moi era - and the Anglo-Leasing scams that came to light under new President Mwai Kibaki. But the government prevented action.

Story continues below advertisement

There is inevitably a lot of detail, and Michela Wrong handles it beautifully, with the style that made her two previous books so engrossing. Wrong is a reporter who has worked throughout Africa for Reuters, the BBC and the Financial Times. In the Footsteps of Mr. Kurtz, her first book, won the PEN James Sterne Prize for non-fiction.

There is a grand theme too in It's Our Turn To Eat: betrayal. The story is Shakespearean in its sweep.

John Githongo was brought from a post as a well-known campaigner against corruption to one of the most exposed jobs in government. He came from the right background to work from within the new establishment. Enormous hopes reposed in him. Yet, as he turned over the stones, it was borne in on him that he was being impeded not just by inertia and the culture of ingrained acceptance of wrongdoing. He was being obstructed, deliberately, by the very people at the heart and at the top of the government that had appointed him.

At first, they cautioned him with Talleyrand's advice to his diplomats: "Surtout, messieurs, point de zèle" (Above all, gentlemen, no zeal). Then they turned on him with accusations of betrayal - of his president, of his government and, above all, of their ethnic and economic interests. Ironically, the betrayal was theirs. Its ugliness led to Githongo's flight in fear of his life in early 2005.









Michela Wrong does this grand theme proud. She brings the protagonists to vivid life. The heroes are all the better for being portrayed without sentimentality and with warts.

The question by the last page is: Was it all worth it? Does the story end in disillusionment? For some who believed in Githongo's campaign, and admired his steadfastness, quite possibly.

The price was high for its central figure. But Githongo is not disillusioned. For him, the struggle is to stop politicians from robbing their own people. He admits his error in believing that elaborate institutions could effect reform. The state's institutions, including the law, can be and have been deformed by corruption.

Story continues below advertisement

He now says he puts his hopes in ordinary people and their growing anger about their rulers' abuse of the trust laid on them.

The cat is out of the bag. It is for Kenyans to hold to account those who make them poor by diverting public money from the public good to private ends.

There are lessons for Kenya's overseas friends too. We development partners must re-examine our official national and multilateral aid programs, and the implicit and explicit understandings on which they are predicated.

And we should raise our own game. Britain is shamed by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development's fierce criticisms of its failure to carry out its international obligations against corruption.

With the banking system in pieces, perhaps now is the time to cleanse its dark corners - and the dark corners of other professions traditionally held in high regard - of its readiness to handle money stolen from struggling people in poor countries. That money has been appropriated by the indecently rich in poor countries who regard government not as a trust or contract with the governed, but as their private possession.

We should have nothing to do with the money or the thieves beyond returning the first and exposing and isolating the second.

Story continues below advertisement

We should stop sheltering bad governments from the consequences of their people's dissatisfaction. The so-called donors should align their taxpayers' interests with Kenyans'. Kenyans are hard-headed people. They do not understand the perverse and indulgent waste of donor money on their corrupt leaders. They see our ministers and others signing cheques and glad-handing those they know to be on the take. They are confused about the message their donor friends wish to send.

If John Githongo is right, then the ordinary people must be encouraged to exercise more rigorously and effectively their democratic right to hold corrupt governments to account. The aid-givers should get out of the way. They should no longer come between the lion and his wrath.

Sir Edward Clay was Britain's high commissioner to Kenya from 2001 to 2005, and was outspoken on governance questions, including corruption.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies