Skip to main content

The CBC Broadcast Centre in Toronto.

The federal government will devote $1.8-billion more to culture and recreation spending over the next decade, "modernize" the Broadcasting Act and Telecommunications Act, and spend more on official and Indigenous languages, according to the budget delivered on Wednesday by Finance Minister Bill Morneau. But anyone looking for details of the extensive cultural-policy overhaul promised by Heritage Minister Mélanie Joly since the government took office in 2015, will find scant evidence for it in the budget papers.

Most of the $1.8-billion in new money will be reserved for up to $1.3-billion in bilateral funding agreements with the provinces. "This investment will be delivered through the second phase of social infrastructure funding," the budget says. Social infrastructure usually means things like day-care centres and affordable housing, as evidenced in a section of the budget that promises "new investments of $21.9-billion over 11 years to support social infrastructure in Canadian communities." It's not clear what kind of bilateral cultural and recreation spending will fit into this envelope.

In spite of the Heritage Minister's national call for proposals to keep Canada's cultural industries competitive in a digital world, there are few hints of any new policy to come in that area. Net neutrality and cultural diversity will be studied, the budget says, and the government will avoid a "protectionist stance that restricts growth and limits opportunities." That could mean less power in the future for the federal broadcasting regulator (Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission), and a continuing laissez-faire approach to online streaming services.

Story continues below advertisement

The new budget includes nothing like the big, specifically targeted infusions in last year's budget for major cultural bodies such as the CBC, Canada Council, National Film Board and Telefilm Canada. The $1.9-billion promised in 2016 to those and other major institutions, including the National Arts Centre and several national museums, is still being paid out, over a five-year commitment period.

The government will provide $300-million over 10 years to the Canada Cultural Spaces Fund, which provides money for new or renovated cultural spaces, and for arts- and heritage-related equipment and feasibility studies. That's $30-million per year, which will not go far in a highly competitive program, access to which is already "difficult for new or emerging organizations as well as innovative, non-traditional, emerging types of spaces," according to a Heritage program review published in 2014. CCSF funding averages 37 per cent for approved projects.

The budget reiterates Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's promise to bring in an Indigenous Languages Act, and pledges $89.9-million in new money over three years to support Indigenous languages and cultures. Of that money, $23-million per year will go to the Aboriginal Languages Initiative (ALI), a $5-million Heritage program widely reviled by Indigenous language activists for its opacity, inefficiency and red tape. Much of the remaining new money will go to archival and preservation efforts related to Indigenous languages and oral history, even though oral history tends to be one of the strongest defining elements of Indigenous cultures.

The focus on ALI received poor early reviews from language activists. "Indigenous peoples need to fight for direct control over Indigenous languages," said Squamish activist Khelsilem Rivers in a tweet. "No INAC [Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada], no Heritage."

Official languages, which constitute the largest single expenditure in the sprawling Heritage portfolio, will receive an additional $80-million over 10 years for renewed educational infrastructure in language-minority communities.

Globe political columnist gives his take on the new Liberal budget, describing it as a plan mired in debt that will hinder the Trudeau government's agenda.
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter