Skip to main content
// //

(L-r) Tobey Maguire as Nick Carraway, Leonardo DiCaprio as Jay Gatsby, Carey Mulligan as Daisy Buchanan and Joel edgerton as Tom Buchanan in a scene from "The Great Gatsby"

Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures

We're still on the cusp of summer movie madness, with The Dark Knight Rises, Prometheus and Snow White and the Huntsman yet to berth in the nation's multiplexes, but already it's beginning to look a lot like Christmas, at least on the Internet.

This week, Warner Bros. dropped the first of what promises to be a fizzy flood of trailers for Baz Luhrmann's adaptation of The Great Gatsby, scheduled for a late-December release.

It's Hollywood's fourth stab at bringing F. Scott Fitzgerald's 1925 novel of longing, deceit and regret to the big screen – a novel that critics in 1998 voted the second greatest work of English-language fiction in the 20th century but whose Jazz Age charms thus far have been better enjoyed on the page than on celluloid.

Story continues below advertisement

If Luhrmann's take joins these ranks, it won't be for lack of ambition. Or budget. The trailer, all two minutes and 27 seconds of it, certainly looks like a few million bucks, uber-stylish in a hot-wired, CGI-enriched Art Deco-meets-Marvel way, with Leonardo DiCaprio back in matinee-idol mode after the "detours" of J. Edgar and Shutter Island.

Indeed, based on the trailer, the film, which was shot in 3D, appears very much of a piece with Romeo+Juliet and Moulin Rouge, Luhrmann's previous hypertrophied forays into doomed romances of days past. The conceit even extends to his musical choices: There's no King Porter Stomp or The Sheik of Araby anywhere on the trailer; instead, it's orchestrated to a soundtrack of Jay-Z and Kanye's No Church in the Wild and the bombast of U2's Love is Blindness, asperformed by Jack White.

These flourishes could end up as just so much meretricious trend-mongering. Then again, one thing that may prove to be on Luhrmann's side is timeliness. Fitzgerald's Gatsby, after all, was an anatomy of his generation's 1 per cent, a tale of dubious fortunes won and lost, of powerful people, he wrote, who "smashed up things and creatures and then retreated into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made."

Oddly enough, Luhrmann's over-the-top might seem very much in-the-pocket.







Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies