Skip to main content

City of Gold takes viewers into Jonathan Gold's universe to tell the improbable story of a revolution inspired by the pen, but driven by the palate.

2.5 out of 4 stars

Title
City of Gold
Written by
Laura Gabbert
Directed by
Laura Gabbert
Starring
Jonathan Gold, David Chang and Roy Choi
Genre
Documentary
Classification
14A
Country
USA
Language
English
Year
2015

Food criticism depends a great deal upon evocation. That's how it's most often praised: the writer whisks us into the restaurant, dines beside us, makes us taste the meal. And that need – to conjure with prose an experience of the senses – may be why the form seems such fertile ground for excellence. A restaurant review ought to be among the most purely functional breeds of criticism, contingent as it is on the fickle tastes and budgets of prospective diners. And yet, often it's the best-written – the most eloquent, the most expressive, even the most beautiful.

Jonathan Gold has long been the clinching argument for food criticism's literary merit. As critic for The Los Angeles Times, and as critic for L.A. Weekly before that, he has sculpted a body of work as impressive, and as serious, as any colleague in more esteemed fields. Gold won the Pulitzer Prize in 2007. That award helped vindicate the genre. And now here arrives City of Gold, a new documentary by Laura Gabbert, which takes Gold and his duties as its estimable subject. Gabbert's film is part portrait, part city symphony. It celebrates Gold as a fixture of his native Los Angeles and L.A. as in thrall to its stalwart guide.

Momofuku's David Chang briefly attests to Gold's repute, declaring, perhaps hyperbolically, that he "doesn't know any Korean person that knows as much about Korean food as Jonathan Gold." Chang distinguishes Gold from other restaurant critics by highlighting his "empathy level." But is it empathy that underwrites Gold's greatness? That he is a genius many people consulted in the film eagerly agree. The dimensions of that brilliance, meanwhile, regularly elude them.

Story continues below advertisement

Much is made of Gold's far-and-wide city travels, his ethnic daring, his enthusiasm in the face of a cheap or unappetizing meal. Probably, yes, readers do appreciate that the leading food critic in L.A. will eat any sort of cuisine in any sort of neighbourhood – a courtesy one will never enjoy in, say, Britain, where the vocation remains swathed in the luxury of haute cuisine.

On the other hand, this emphasis on exploration misses the point. It isn't Gold's omnivorous sensibility that makes him a valuable critic; nor is it his taste, which by most accounts is unimpeachable. Gold is important because Gold is a great writer. No further argument necessary.

It's hardly surprising, then, that the most compelling thing in City of Gold is its subject's own words, read aloud by Gold and others in voice-over. A passing reference to a dish as "spicy as a novella and as bitter as tears" ought to be enough to convince the skeptical of the writer's distinction. Many of the film's interviewees seem inclined to defend Gold as somehow above food criticism: he's venerated for his activism, his authenticity, his contributions to the public good. This is the wrong approach. If Jonathan Gold is a genius, it isn't because he has emerged superior to the humble practice of writing about food. It is because he is an exemplar of the trade. Any argument for Gold goes further: it is a testament to how great such work can be.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter