Skip to main content

For No Good Reason looks at the life of Ralph Steadman, a cartoonist who worked with Hunter S. Thompson.

2 out of 4 stars

Directed by
Charlie Paul
Starring
Ralph Steadman, Johnny Depp and Hunter S. Thompson
Classification
14A
Country
USA
Language
English
Year
2014

Trigger warning: For No Good Reason, a film about British cartoonist Ralph Steadman, prominently features that anthropomorphic tangle of beads and neckerchiefs, Johnny Depp. The formerly talented indie darling cum smirking heartthrob of contemporary pirate cinema serves as a guide through this out-of-the-can portrait of an artist.

Director Charlie Paul even grants privileged access into Depp's interiority, allowing the viewer to wade ankle-deep in his shallow intuitions and half-formed thoughts. "I'm really looking forward to catching up with [Steadman] at his studio," Depp says early in the film, as if something that tantalizes Johnny Depp should immediately entice the viewer.

For sure, Steadman is a worthy subject of a documentary. A talented cartoonist, he's known first for giving illustrated life to "gonzo journalist" Hunter S. Thompson's writing, and second as a critic in his own right. His splattered images of human savagery and viciousness inherit a legacy of social grotesquerie that runs through Leonardo da Vinci and Francis Bacon.

Story continues below advertisement

Unfortunately, For No Good Reason sidelines Steadman's own bona fides, functioning primarily as a second-hand documentary of Thompson, stoking the hagiography of the late hipster icon.

Even in its liveliest segments, For No Good Reason uses Steadman's art as an adjunct to Thompson's. Depp – who has twice played Thompson on screen – provides clipped, stony readings of the author's prose as Steadman's snarling, ink-splatter whatzits churn to life on screen, animating the pair's quasi-journalistic escapades to "cover" the Kentucky Derby, the Rumble in the Jungle, the gambling floors of Sin City and elsewhere.

Steadman dutifully notes that, beyond the occasional drunken lost weekend, he never shared his collaborator's famously heroic metabolism for hard drugs. It makes for a nice image: the hard-partying, balls-tripping writer accompanied by the squat, soberish-second-thought guy ("Like chalk and cheese," Steadman calls it).

But in place of Thompson's stream of stoned, frequently exhilarating, intermittently perceptive prose is Steadman's withering contemptuousness. Thompson revelled in life's many opportunities for depravity and reprobate behaviour. Steadman seems to genuinely loathe (and, sure, fear) the depraved reprobates. Of an early photographic expedition to New York, Steadman says he was drawn toward skid row as a "museum of misery and deprivation," sounding like a stunned high-schooler who has never seen a homeless person before.

(Steadman produced a year-end 2013 cover illustration for the Toronto alt-weekly Now, which imagined Mayor Rob Ford as a fleshy pig in a suit and tie.)

Steadman's temperament is defined by an adolescent acuity for the "weirdness" of American life and the institutions of power. Ditto his approach to his work. "I needed to apply it as a weapon," Steadman says of his early artistic ambitions, echoing Picasso's and summing up the motivations of generations of satirists, artists and political cartoonists – any doodler who got his start scribbling devil horns on the head of the homeroom teacher.

Less trite than Steadman's evaluations of his work is the work itself: exciting, ugly and easily identifiable by Pollackian streaks of India ink and an unblinking embrace of unpleasantness. Scenes of Steadman slogging in his studio, accompanied by the artist's thoughts on his heroes (Picasso, Bacon, Rembrandt) offer a reprieve to the warmed-over social commentary.

Story continues below advertisement

But they're too few and far between. And they're invariably marred by cut-in shots of Depp hauling on bespoke cigarettes and cheering, "Wow! That's incredible!," as if we'll all be similarly bowled over, just because Willy Wonka 2.0 says so.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies