Skip to main content

Julianne Moore plays a mother of three who tries to present a good front while struggling with early-onset Alzheimer’s disease in Still Alice.

Linda Kallerus/Sony Pictures Classics

2.5 out of 4 stars

Title
Still Alice
Written by
Richard Glatzer and Wash Westmoreland
Directed by
Richard Glatzer and Wash Westmoreland
Starring
Julianne Moore, Alec Baldwin, Kristen Stewart
Country
USA
Language
English

The movie Still Alice is about a New York professor, Alice Howland, played by Julianne Moore. Shortly after her 50th birthday, she begins showing symptoms of early-onset Alzheimer's disease and the film follows the progress of the condition from her point of view.

Based on neuroscientist Lisa Genova's 2007 bestselling novel of the same name, Still Alice is accurate and compassionate, and anyone who has known someone with Alzheimer's will appreciate the film's sincere intentions. Apart from Moore's measured central performance, however, the movie, adapted by co-directors Richard Glatzer and Wash Westmoreland, is workmanlike. The filmmakers rely on obvious tricks of playing with overlapping and out-of-focus shots to show Alice's confusion. They leave out the paranoia, anger and physical deterioration.

In its depiction of family issues, the script appears to be following the checked boxes on a medical chart. There's a half-formed subplot about the sibling rivalry between Alice's adult daughters Anna (Kate Bosworth) and Lydia (Kristen Stewart). (Siblings may find existing tensions are exacerbated by the illness of a parent.) The performance from Alec Baldwin, as Alice's medical-researcher husband, John, is so weirdly unctuous and menacing, you might suspect he's slipping drugs into her favourite Pinkberry Yogurt. (A spouse, struggling to deal with the changes in a loved one, may become withdrawn and distant.)

Story continues below advertisement

Among the more heavy-handed ironies, Alice is a brilliant linguistics professor ("I've always been defined by my intellect"). Her life is a testament to the benefits of being smart: She and her husband live in an elegant Manhattan apartment and have a summer house on Long Island. Their eldest daughter, Anna, is a lawyer, preparing to produce their first grandchild. Their middle child, Tom (Hunter Parrish), is about to finish medical school.

The only hair in this perfect bowl of cream is the youngest daughter, Lydia (Stewart), who skipped college to go to Los Angeles to try to make it as an actress. After Alice heads out to California to deliver a lecture – and has her first disturbing forgetful moment at the podium – she visits Lydia. They have a familiar argument about Alice's wish to have Lydia go to university and give up this frivolous acting business.

Why is the character an actress? In the novel, Alice, in her decline, sometimes imagined she was in one of Lydia's plays, living an alternate reality, like her namesake, the Lewis Carroll heroine who disappeared through the looking-glass. The subplot about theatre also allows Lydia to offer her mother the solace of art, quoting poetic passages about loss from Anton Chekhov's The Three Sisters and, especially, Tony Kushner's Angels in America.

For the movie's purposes, we have the added irony of seeing Julianne Moore, of all people, belittling the power of acting. At its best, Still Alice is about acting, about trying to present a good front and how a great actress can communicate what is otherwise unreachable. Moore's gift is her transparent emotional presence: Even when Alice is trying to cover up, she's wonderfully readable. During many scenes in the film, the camera simply focuses on her pale, freckled face, registering her fear and struggle for control: Getting the diagnosis from a doctor, telling her children the bad news, talking to her supervisor at work. At other times, Moore simply interacts with her smartphone, on which she has left herself prerecorded questions, to monitor her condition for as long as she's capable.

Still Alice is being called a career performance for Moore, and although it may be one of her most poignant roles (it has earned her a fifth Oscar nomination), the part barely scratches the surface of her ability. If you've seen Neil Jordan's 2000 short film of Samuel Beckett's play Not I, which features nothing but Moore's mouth on screen as she rails against her trauma, you'll see how tentatively Still Alice edges toward that same abyss.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter