Skip to main content

Great Great Great, billed as a dark comedy, follows a couple whose relationship is ‘just fine,’ until one of them decides she wants more.

2 out of 4 stars

Title
Great Great Great
Written by
Adam Garnet Jones and Sarah Kolasky
Directed by
Adam Garnet Jones
Starring
Sarah Kolasky, Daniel Beirne, Richard Clarkin
Country
USA
Language
English

The indie film Great Great Great is billed as a dark comedy. It's not. It's more a dark, cautionary tale about a young woman who wants it all – a good man, a sordid affair, a conventional wedding, an unconventional life, a monogamous sex life, a kinky, extramarital one – and plays the dualities off against one other, until she's almost left with nothing at all.

Lauren (played by Sarah Kolasky, who co-wrote and co-produced the film with Adam Garnet Jones) has been in a committed, long-term relationship with boyfriend Tom (Daniel Beirne), an all-round decent (but kind of boring) guy who is temporarily out of work as an urban planner. So Tom fills his days building Lego structures in their tiny apartment or hitting the neighbourhood gym. Lauren, the quintessential passive-aggressive, tells him, in loving tones, to basically get a life. To be, essentially, "more" than he currently is.

Lauren – a self-styled mother figure – likes to make Tom pastel-coloured macarons and bring him whisky on the rocks. She's got the decent job. She's bringing home the paycheque. She has the last say. And Tom's content to let Lauren be the alpha in their relationship. Except for his lack of gainful employment, he's more or less happy with his lot as the runner-up in their family of two.

Story continues below advertisement

But his partner can't help but wonder if there shouldn't be more. Everything – their sex life, their ability to communicate, their living arrangement – is all "just fine." Lauren craves the almighty "more" and she looks for it in all the wrong places.

Still, the young couple's relationship is at the point where marriage feels like the obvious next step. But Lauren's restless discontent leads her to look for a greener pasture. When an old flame shows up at her office she launches into a torrid affair that involves frequent trips to the basement storeroom. There's little evidence she's racked with guilt. Instead, Lauren heads home and tells Tom they should get married. He was planning to ask her as soon as he found a job. Once again, Lauren has beaten him to the punch and is calling the shots.

Tom buys her an engagement ring on credit, and Lauren starts planning the wedding. But out of the blue, she also decides to look at a bachelor apartment. Is it a hideaway for secret trysts? Is she planning on ditching Tom? No. Instead she meets her bridesmaids and carries on her double life.

Beirne and Kolasky's performances hit many high notes. The emasculated Tom's pain and confusion is palpable. And Kolasky is a slyly adept at playing both the virgin and the whore. But the seesaw she's on makes little sense, and that's a glaring loose thread in the script. The audience is supposed to feel empathy for Lauren's predicament, but we (at least this reviewer) did not.

Apparently, the filmmakers – who met at Ryerson University film school – decided to reshoot the original ending after focus groups complained it was too "happy" to be believable. So Great Great Great ends as it began – on an ambiguous note. Perhaps that was the filmmakers' intent, but it leaves the viewer dissatisfied. Is Lauren happy with how things eventually turn out? Or is she eventually going to seek another green pasture? Like poor Tom, we really don't have a clue.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter