Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Frank Langella in a scene from “Robot and Frank”

SAMUEL GOLDWYN FILMS

2.5 out of 4 stars

Title
Robot & Frank
Written by
Christopher Ford
Directed by
Jake Schreier
Starring
Frank Langella, Susan Sarandon and Peter Sarsgaard
Genre
Comedy
Classification
PG
Country
USA
Language
English
Year
2012

Very charming but very slight, Robot & Frank is a movie about an old man named Frank played by an old actor named Frank (Frank Langella), in which both the character and the actor prove that they have unexpected resources. Created by first-time director Jake Schreier and writer Christopher Ford, it's a sort of budget sci-fi story crossed with a tale of progressive dementia, and, over all, it suffers from conceptual fuzziness: a comedy that is not quite funny; a serious allegory about aging that is hard to take seriously.

In compensation, there is yet another great Frank Langella performance in what is becoming a habit for the senior actor. He plays Frank Weld , a former jewel thief living in a rambling country home. His yuppie son (James Marsden) insists that he either accepts a new health-care robot or be sent to the "memory centre" for treatment. The robot, which is as tall as a small adult or a large child (dancer Rachael Ma inside a robot suit), is apparently made of white plastic with a globe for a head and no facial features. It speaks in a mellifluous male voice (Peter Sarsgaard) that suggests its programmers watched a lot of 2001: A Space Odyssey.

The central delight of the film is watching Langella interact with this semi-animate object, a performance that makes you think that you would really enjoy watching him onstage, where he has had a much more illustrious career than in film. Only in the past decade has he emerged as an important film presence, taking on rich roles (Richard Nixon in Frost/Nixon and an aging novelist in Starting Out in the Evening) and knocking them out of the park with his combination of dignity and vulnerability. In Robot & Frank, he adds a couple of new dimensions to his repertoire, as a crank and a scoundrel.

Story continues below advertisement

Langella, slipping into New Joisey gangsterese, is initially hostile to the presence of this prissy droid, serving him health food and imposing early bedtimes. Eventually, though, he accepts the home cooking and when he discovers its skill set includes petty theft, he gets excited. Here is the perfect assistant to return to his life of crime: casing joints, picking locks and helping with getaways. The robot, programmed to help Frank find a meaningful hobby, goes along, but what can the old man possibly want or need?

In screenwriter Christopher Ford's slightly futuristic world, the erasure of memory is more than just a biological problem, it's a new agenda. Frank likes to go to the library, where the books are about to be replaced by a digital archive. The mastermind is a creepy technocrat (Jeremy Strong), who gets off on the wrong foot with Frank by saying to him: "You're so square, you're practically avant-garde."

Frank's first heist is a vintage edition of Don Quixote, as a present for his favourite librarian, Jennifer (Susan Sarandon). For his next job, he turns his eye toward the new library director's nearby modernist palace and his richly bejewelled lawyer wife.

The secondary characters here seem extremely secondary. As the evil library director, Strong gives a performance that is broad enough to belong to a Will Ferrell comedy. Liv Tyler pops up as Frank's daughter, a globehopping hippie do-gooder who opposes the use of robot servants. The son (Marsden) appears only at the beginning and end of the film, while Jennifer the librarian stares at Frank with a puzzling, affectionate saucer-eyed adoration.

Much of Robot & Frank is (frankly) resistible, including the climactic narrative twist, but there is also a likeable oddness that transcends the sentimental contrivance. One could easily imagine the entire story as a one-man stage play about Frank's senescent delirium, in which he imagines that robots have taken over. Or, to put it another way, the movie's so square, it's almost avant-garde.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies