Skip to main content

Film Reviews The Unbelievers: Doc on the debate between science and religion is almost comically superficial

Richard Dawkins, left, and Lawrence Krauss in Sydney, Australia, in a scene from The Unbelievers.

A Black Chalk Production

1 out of 4 stars

Written by
Gus Holwerda, Luke Holwerda, Lawrence Krauss
Directed by
Gus Holwerda
Starring
Richard Dawkins, Lawrence Krauss
Classification
PG
Country
USA
Language
English
Year
2013

Anyone interested in the contemporary debate between atheists and religious believers will gain nothing of value from the documentary The Unbelievers, Gus Holwerda's almost comically superficial film that follows American physicist Lawrence Krauss and English biologist Richard Dawkins on an Australian book tour to promote their pro-science, pro-atheism message.

Krauss and Dawkins offer a reasonable one-two-punch argument that no supernatural being is required to explain the origins of the universe 13.6-billion years ago, or to explain how human beings evolved from the primordial chemical soup. But that much would seem to be basic high-school science, and the ease with which the scientists demolish a Muslim debater in Canberra and an ill-informed archbishop in Sydney is not impressive, though both Dawkins (author of The God Delusion) and Krauss (A Universe from Nothing) seem exceedingly self-satisfied.

Dawkins scores some points on how U.S. politicians claim to be religious for their political careers, but there's simply not enough time given to any meaningful exchange of ideas. Otherwise, a succession of direct-to-camera celebrity endorsements from Sarah Silverman, Ricky Gervais, Cameron Diaz, Bill Pullman, Woody Allen and others tends to undermine rather than reinforce the seriousness of the message.

Story continues below advertisement

The film culminates in a 2013 Reason Rally in Washington, where Dawkins and Krauss receive rock-star welcomes from an ebullient throng, and proceed to preach to the happily unconverted.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter