Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Rather than serve in praise of, the movies have been exceedingly unkind to older women. And by "older" I don't mean senior citizens; I mean women past the age of Jennifer Lawrence. Actresses have been telling us this for some time: that the dearth of roles for mature women has been terrible for the profession. I would add that it is also terrible for viewers. In particular, women of a certain age.

I may spend a lot less time looking in the mirror these days, but that doesn't mean I don't want to see myself reflected on screen.

A study released last month confirms that the older a woman gets, the less Hollywood gives her to say. But, surprise: for men, it's the opposite – the older they get, the more lines they get (and no, I'm not talking about crow's feet), at least up to age 65.

Story continues below advertisement

The data visualization website Polygraph analyzed dialogue in 2,000 films. Men between 42 and 65 spoke 55 million words, compared to women in that age range, who delivered a paltry 11 million. Not that younger women have it better; men were assigned more dialogue in every age range over 21 – even in romantic comedies and Disney films. Even Frozen.

Premium TV is showing some maturity on this front. In the past couple of weeks, two series have released second seasons that portray older women as smart, complex and sexy. HBO Canada's Sensitive Skin stars Kim Cattrall as Davina, a woman in her 50s dealing with midlife issues. Sensitive Skin has its flaws, but I don't care. The show presents a character who, entering this next chapter of life, is asking the same question so many real women her age are wondering: What now?

Another refreshing (if imperfect) show portraying older women is Grace and Frankie, the Netflix series anchored by Jane Fonda and Lily Tomlin, playing septuagenarians whose husbands have left them – for each other. Shocked, the WASPy Grace (Fonda) and the bong-toting Earth Mother Frankie (Tomlin) move in together and contemplate life now.

The arc of Fonda's Grace has seen her evolve from uptight, entitled and empathy-starved to a kinder, stronger, not-quite-as-uptight woman exploring her sexuality.

How often can we talk about meaningful development in a female TV character in her 70s? Or her 40s, for that matter? In the best scene of The Good Wife's final season, (spoiler alert)  Alicia (Julianna Margulies), distraught over a revelation about her dead lover, Will, nears the end of her middle-aged rope.

"Sometimes I swear I just want to go into my bedroom, pull the covers over my head and never do anything ever again," the lawyer tells a friend, tossing clothes into the wash. "I just sit here alone in this stupid little apartment wondering what the hell happened to my life. Was it all about having two kids … and then shoving them off to be someone important? Seriously, was that the point?"

How many women have felt frustration and emptiness as they cycle through endless loads of laundry? What was the point of all those loads? What was the point, period?

Story continues below advertisement

The series finale, which aired this month, has been controversial – in particular the final sequence (spoiler alert: to remain innocent, readers should skip ahead two paragraphs): Alicia approaches Diane (Christine Baranski), her mentor and perhaps future partner at an all-female firm. And Diane delivers a shocker of a slap. Many Good Wife devotees were outraged. How dare this series, one of so few on network television to give female characters the spotlight, break up this solid feminist duo?

I believe the slap was the ultimate feminist ending: because Alicia chose to stand by her (ethically challenged) man – to the detriment of the good women (and men) in her life, she winds up isolated. Being a good wife was a bad choice. Better to be a kickass lawyer, a loyal friend – and for viewers like me, an inspiring role model: a complicated, successful woman who demonstrated resilience in the face of scandal. I'll miss her. I want more of this kind of character on all my screens.

There are efforts under way to get more women behind the camera. Meryl Streep is funding a screenwriting lab for women over 40, the NFB has introduced a gender-parity initiative, Telefilm and the Canada Media Fund say gender parity is a priority. There are programs and awards for female filmmakers; Women in Film and Television Vancouver announced its Spotlight Award winners this week.

This is not unrelated to the on-screen imbalance. Cattrall, 59, Fonda, 78, and Tomlin, 76, are all executive producers on their shows and Margulies, 49, was a producer. Sure, few have their clout, but if women want to turn things around, not simply be cast as two-dimensional wife or mother (or not cast at all), we're going to have to take charge. And we may just have to mirror what's simply the best approach to aging: own it.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies