Skip to main content

Film Reviews The Angry Birds Movie 2 is just a smidge better than Baby Shark, and in the last days of summer, that’s all we can ask for

Jason Sudeikis voices Red in The Angry Birds Movie 2.

Courtesy of Sony Pictures

  • The Angry Birds Movie 2
  • Directed by: Thurop Van Orman
  • Written by: Peter Ackerman
  • Featuring the voices of: Jason Sudeikis, Josh Gad and Leslie Jones
  • Classification: PG; 96 minutes

rating

To tell the story of The Angry Birds Movie 2, one must first flash back all the way to 2009. It was a simpler time. Barack Obama was U.S. president. We had only recently stopped using our phones as phones. Commuters and young families, not yet inundated with Instagram and Peppa Pig to amuse themselves, turned to a mobile gaming app called Angry Birds.

The threadbare premise was enjoyable enough. Whether nursing a newborn or sitting on the subway, you could find yourself addictively tapping at a screen in a futile attempt to launch multi-coloured birds from a slingshot at the evil pigs who threatened to take over the world.

A decade later, Angry Birds has gone from a harmless time-waster to a verifiable media empire, launching 18 video-games (including one in virtual reality), an animated television show, a line of toys involving multiple franchises (Angry Birds Star Wars, Angry Birds Transformers), a theme park in Finland, a line of soft drinks and an attraction at the Kennedy Space Center called Angry Birds Space Encounter.

Story continues below advertisement

There are also two movies, the second of which opens this week. The story of the original Angry Birds film (which made about US$350-million at the box office in 2016) centered on a protagonist named Red (voiced by Jason Sudekis). Red isn’t so much angry as he is downtrodden and sarcastic. After spending a lifetime feeling criminally unloved by his fellow avians, perhaps due to his comically over-sized eyebrows, Red finds himself investigating suspicious-acting pigs. He and his bird friends end up foiling the plans of their evil porcine leader Leonard (Bill Hader), who plans on stealing and eating their young. Finally, after saving the day, Red experiences what it is like to be adored by all of his fellow birds and his mild sense of resentment dissipates forever.

Red teams up with frenemy pig Leonard to take on an unknown threat.

Courtesy of Sony Pictures

Flipping the switch, the plot of Angry Birds 2 begins with a truce being called between all of pig and bird kind. That sends Red, who was just getting used to his hero status, into an existential tailspin until both species find themselves under attack from an unknown threat. It’s a giant purple bird named Zeta (Leslie Jones), who lives fabulously on an isolated frozen volcano with her daughter Debbie (Tiffany Haddish). When Zeta decides she’d like to expand her territory, Red teams up with his pig frenemy Leonard and some new sidekicks, voiced by welcome additions including Awkwafina and Sterling K. Brown. Rebecca Bloom plays Silver, a brainiac engineer who threatens Red’s ego (yet quickens his heartbeat), thanks to her natural leadership skills and sheer intelligence. She seems way cooler and much younger than the embittered and charmless Red, but whatever! Eyebrows!

With a current rating of about 70 per cent on Rotten Tomatoes, the Angry Birds sequel is now the highest-rated video-game movie in the site’s history. It’s definitely a quicker, more entertaining upgrade but remains formless as an actual motion picture. The pleasures come from a multitude of quick-paced gags that trade in break-dancing competitions, needle-drop montages, hatchlings adorably mispronouncing swear words, candy-coloured CGI-tropical environments, so many fart and butt jokes, plus a Dawson’s Creek-indebted flashback involving an ill-fated romance between birds. (I enjoyed that!)

The movie also features a brand new directing and screenwriting team, who seemed to have taken a page from the #MeToo movement. The plight of Silver and Zeta sees them trying to assert their authority around insecure and commitment-phobic male birds. While these characters aren’t entirely defined by their relationships, their characters stand out in a generally bland male ensemble doomed to re-enact Baby Shark parodies and pass gas until eternity. We know why these caged birds sing.

Parts of this new Angry Birds have the fun comic mania of a classic Bugs Bunny cartoon or a Marx Brothers reel. A sequence in which three adorable baby birds try to rescue some eggs that have drifted off to sea is pure visual merriment. A scene in which Red and his team must puppeteer a dead-eyed oversized eagle costume in order to sneak past the security guards is strange and Weekend at Bernie’s-enough to be genuinely subversive, especially when that eagle is forced to pee next to another eagle security guard at the urinal.

And yet, there’s a mean-spiritedness here that isn’t necessary. On at least two occasions, characters commit acts of cruelty and violence without consequence. No one gets a full-fledged character arc except Red, who finally learns how to share credit with his teammates. Yet even that pales in comparison to every other animated franchise in recent memory, which know how to craft compelling characters with way more emotional payoff and investment than this lazy film wants to muster up.

Just like its mobile incarnation, The Angry Birds Movie 2 simply pelts you with loud, shrieking diversions. The filmmaking has levelled up, but you’re still wasting your time.

Story continues below advertisement

The Angry Birds Movie 2 opens Aug. 16

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter