Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Singer Corb Lund, centre, sings on land proposed for coal mine development in the eastern slopes of the Livingstone range south west of Longview, Alta., June 16, 2021.

Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian Press

With hits like the Roughest Neck Around that celebrate oil workers, country rocker Corb Lund might not be an obvious choice as a campaigner against fossil fuel expansion.

But the Alberta music star has taken on an unexpected new role, as a leader of efforts to stop new open pit coal mines in western Canada’s iconic Rocky Mountains.

Alberta has been hit by the cancellation of the planned Keystone XL pipeline to the United States, as U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration steps up action on climate change.

Story continues below advertisement

Now it is looking to expand coal mining in the Rocky Mountain foothills – but Mr. Lund has helped pull together an unlikely coalition of opponents, including ranchers, rural landowners, Indigenous groups, urban environmentalists and some oil industry workers.

“This isn’t a left-right issue. This issue seems to be resonating across the political spectrum – conservative, rural, urban and First Nations,” Mr. Lund told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

“It has been moving to see, in these super divided times, people agree on something.”

As climate change threats – from runaway wildfires to record heat – strengthen, building such unlikely coalitions will be key to winning consensus on slashing fossil fuel use and driving broader climate action, analysts say.

Mr. Lund, a sixth-generation southern Alberta rancher as well as an award-winning musician, says digging for more coal in the rugged Rockies – the postcard image of Western Canada – doesn’t make sense.

“I am biased because I am from this area. But I have travelled a lot in my career as a musician and I haven’t seen anything as beautiful,” he said.

“It doesn’t make sense to rip up our mountains and poison our water for something already in production in other places.”

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Lund is not a climate activist – “For me, it’s more about the water or the landscape than climate change,” he said.

But “I can’t imagine coal being a positive for the climate,” he admitted.

‘NOT A HIPPY CROWD’

Supporters of new coal mines in the Rockies argue they will create jobs and tax income for the government and can be operated in a sustainable manner.

Coal from the area would be used for steelmaking, rather than heat or electricity – two uses of coal rapidly being phased out around the world.

Creating steel with renewable energy, however, is more challenging and companies argue they may need to continue using coal for this purpose a little while longer.

But critics say open pit mining will permanently destroy the picturesque mountain area. They also worry chemicals used in the extraction process, including selenium, will poison the province’s ever-scarcer water resources.

Story continues below advertisement

Alberta’s Department of Energy, the government body responsible for approving new mining permits, did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

The campaign against coal mining, featuring images of ranchers riding their horses through rivers in the shadow of the mountains and traversing grassy valleys, has helped rally to the cause local people who might not normally take an interest.

“This is not a hippy environmentalist crowd,” said Bobbi Lambright of the Livingstone Landowners Group, an organization in southwestern Alberta opposed to open pit coal mining.

When the campaign started, “one of the biggest challenges we were having … [was] the vast majority of Albertans had no idea about this threat,” she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Mr. Lund’s decision to join the campaign in January changed that, she said.

“When Corb became aware and started putting facts out on social media, people started to pay attention.”

Story continues below advertisement

CHANGING REGULATIONS

Alberta’s government opened parts of the eastern Rockies to coal exploration in May, 2020, rescinding a decades-old prohibition.

Coal companies then began applying for leases and exploring for deposits.

Between June, 2020, and February, 2021, 169 new leases were issued covering about 188,000 hectares (465,000 acres), said Katie Morrison, an official with the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society in Alberta, a conservation group opposed to coal mining.

Those leases have led to growing opposition, she said.

“The government, I think, misjudged Albertans on this when it comes to these really special places and our water,” Ms. Morrison told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

“I have never seen a movement like this around an issue in Alberta before,” she said. “I feel like the tide is turning a bit.”

Story continues below advertisement

Following a public outcry, the Alberta government started public consultations in March, 2021, and later suspended exploration on some land as comments continued to pour in.

A few companies still have permits for mining but are not actively exploring while consultations are under way, Ms. Morrison said.

Mr. Lund’s involvement has made it easier for people who were concerned about coal mining but didn’t feel comfortable speaking publicly to take a stand, she said, noting she “really saw a change” after he became involved.

On Mr. Lund’s Facebook page, where he frequently posts articles and updates about the mining fight, many fans have backed his activism.

“Thank you for taking the time to educate us all and fight for such an amazing and beautiful area,” fan Shannon Lee Booth wrote.

Others have tagged their elected representatives, urging them to take action.

Story continues below advertisement

But some have been more critical.

“While I like and enjoy your music, I do not agree with you on this,” fan Jason Thornhill wrote. “Many families are counting on these mines to contribute to their survival.”

In response to public opposition, Alberta officials have created a Coal Policy Committee to make recommendations to the government on use of the province’s coal, with a final report due in November.

“The protection of our lands and water remains of critical importance as we develop our natural resources,” the province’s energy and environment ministries said in a statement last month, as they cancelled one coal mining project.

Mr. Lund called the dropping of that Grassy Mountain coal project “a major victory” for the movement, though stressed the campaign is far from over.

In its decision, the government cited concerns from regulators about protection of water quality and fish habitat.

“All proposed coal projects are subject to stringent review to ensure development is safe, environmentally responsible and meets all requirements,” the statement noted.

Sign up for The Globe’s arts and lifestyle newsletters for more news, columns and advice in your inbox.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies