Skip to main content

Sir Andrew Davis conducts the Toronto Symphony Orchestra.

Jag Gundu/tso

Amadeus has a lot to answer for. The Academy Award-winning movie, based on Peter Shaffer’s play (in turn inspired by Pushkin’s Mozart and Salieri), created an image of Mozart held firmly within popular imagination. It’s that of a broke party boy either poisoned or worked to death by a jealous rival who composed his own Requiem in highly mysterious circumstances. Such apocryphal stories have made for good marketing of his music. As the Toronto Symphony Orchestra proved on Wednesday however, Mozart’s work, especially that composed toward (or at) the end of his life, needs no such hype. The concerts continue Thursday, Friday and Saturday at Roy Thomson Hall.

Mozart’s Symphony No. 39 in E-flat Major, K. 543, composed in 1788, is the first of three final symphonies done in rapid succession. TSO conductor laureate Sir Andrew Davis led a performance that looked backward (to Handel) and forward (to Beethoven), and remained rooted firmly in its time (via Haydn), to offer an interesting reflection on both the development of the symphony as a form and its range of expressive possibilities in terms of orchestration.

This was a performance marked by gentility and grace, giving special prominence to the interplay between woodwinds and strings. The symphony marks the first of Mozart’s mature works that did not make use of an oboe, but instead transferred higher sonorities onto the clarinet. Long-time TSO principal clarinet Joaquin Valdepenas and the woodwinds section provided clear thematic development between the first and second movements, with Davis emphasizing syncopations with precise gestures.

Story continues below advertisement

The rhythms of the Landler (an energetic Austrian folk dance) of the third movement were less reminiscent of the beer hall jigs from which they derived than directly linked to the colours Haydn later used in his oratorio The Seasons in 1801. This was a performance of great elegance and style, qualities which extended into the TSO’s performance of Mozart’s Requiem, K. 626.

Mozart was commissioned to write the Requiem not by some mysterious stranger but by aristocrat Franz von Walsegg, and composed a small portion of it before his death in 1792, with his pupil Franz Xaver Suessmayr filling the considerable holes.

Davis, who is also music director and principal conductor at the Lyric Opera Chicago, showed his operatic side, with careful control of voice and orchestra, emphasizing the work’s contrapuntal harmonies and underlining its links with Handel’s Messiah, particularly through the Lacrimosa and Sanctus movements.

Soloists Jenavieve Moore (soprano), Jillian Bonner (mezzo-soprano), Charles Sy (tenor), and Trevor Eliot Bowes (bass), members of the Equilibrium Young Artists Initiative all had projection issues amidst the orchestra’s textural swells. But Davis took this in stride, integrating the voices within the orchestra and evoking soft, thoughtful colours less concerned with hellfire and brimstone and more interested in meandering brooks and shimmering valleys. Thus the vocalists, together with the Toronto Mendelssohn Choir, were smart sonic extensions of the orchestration, with Davis underlining the theme of integration within a divine hereafter.

Live your best. We have a daily Life & Arts newsletter, providing you with our latest stories on health, travel, food and culture. Sign up today.

Related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies