Skip to main content

Puppeteer Steven Kerzner poses for a portrait with wife and collaborator Liana Kerzner and media personality Ed The Sock in Toronto, Friday, May 11, 2018. (Galit Rodan/The Globe and Mail)

Galit Rodan

The internet is a cacophony of voices, and now it’s time to put a sock in it. Ed the Sock, to be precise. The irascible cigar-chomping hand puppet who gruffly graced MuchMusic and Toronto’s CITY-TV in the 1990s and 2000s is making a comeback, with furrowed brow, gravelly voice and permanent scowl intact.

Steven Kerzner (the voice of Ed) and his writer-producer wife and collaborator Liana Kerzner have created the FU Network, an online hub for Ed the Sock content and more. FU, of course, is an acronym of “for us.” Add an “N” and you get fun, which is the point behind what the Kerzners describe as “Vice, with a sense of humour.”

Television watchers of a certain generation look back upon the glory days of CHUM Media and MuchMusic wistfully. With their FU Network, the Kerzners aim to bring back some of the era’s edge, informality and sense of community. “There’s something missing in Canadian media,” says Steven Kerzner, in a voice considerably smoother than the one used by his puppet persona. “The CHUM vibe is gone. That whole MuchMusic, relatable, peer-level Canadian voice is something people miss.”

Story continues below advertisement

Savvy and outspoken, the Kerzners are nobody’s puppets. At their east-end headquarters recently, they spoke to The Globe and Mail about the durable appeal of a green-haired big-mouth and the voices that need to be heard today.

***

Steven Kerzner: Ed started out as Vaudeville, shticky stuff. Then we found that there’s tremendous license using a character to address human concerns. When it’s The Simpsons or when it’s Ed the Sock, there’s a lot of potential to get past people’s barriers and get them to look at issues in the vernacular and with a sense of humour. That’s what MuchMusic was. That’s what the FU Network is going to be. It’s your thoughts out loud. It’s people talking, laughing and using that license that we have.

Liana Kerzner: Here was this tell-it-like-it-is puppet. You didn’t always agree with him. Sure, at times, he offended you. But you got the sense that someone was telling you what they really thought.

Steven: He wasn’t intending to offend. It wasn’t stuff to offend. It was stuff that may offend.

Liana: Also, people are always looking for something that is not going to fail them. And Ed has always been Ed. It’s a big voice, small guy. He never comes across as a bully. I think every generation is looking for an authentic point of view from someone who seems to know more than you, but isn’t looking down at you.

Steven: I think Ed is a megaphone for the things people think but are afraid to say. But also, Ed is a mirror. He’s a mirror that is held up to society, but that doesn’t make people look ugly. It sees them in all their imperfections, but finds beauty in those imperfections. This is us, but we’re alright. This is what we think. And where’s the fun nowadays online? Everything is outrage. We want to change that. We don’t have to hate each other. We don’t have to beat each other down.

Story continues below advertisement

Liana: And it’s not just Ed the Sock. I think there’s a thirst for the old MuchMusic vibe. And that vibe is on the Internet. People want less-produced and more authentic. People want an online place to go and get quality content … We’re caught in this drama loop. The YouTube algorithm doesn’t seem to be serving anyone but YouTube.

Steven: The stuff we were doing on Much was the internet before the internet. It was YouTube before YouTube. It was authentic. It was inexpensive. It was relatable. But it was ahead of its time. It was predictive of what mass audiences really want. With the technology now, we have the potential of what was there and we’ll be able to grow it even more. So, we’ve decided to bring it back, but in a modern form. And Ed is sort of the spirit animal of the network.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter