Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Into spy thrillers? Then you have to watch Archer (and laugh)

Archer on FX - created by Adam Reed

Homeland may have the awards (including the Golden Globe bestowed on Sunday), but the best espionage series on television is Archer, an animated satire that starts its fourth season on FX on Jan. 19 (the series airs in Canada on Teletoon at Night).

A wildly anachronistic pastiche of spy-movie tropes centred on a dysfunctional U.S. intelligence agency, the show features a bleakly hilarious sensibility that is consolidated in its main character, Sterling Archer (voiced by comedian H. Jon Benjamin), a secret agent whose laundry list of character flaws include – but are hardly limited to – alcoholism, sociopathic narcissism and mom issues that would make Norman Bates blush. The latter are exacerbated by the fact that his mother, Malory Archer (Jessica Walter), is also his boss. Imagine the oddly possessive, quasi-romantic maternal dynamic in Skyfall between Daniel Craig's James Bond and Judi Dench's M after about three highballs and laced with arsenic and you're about halfway there.

The shadow of 007 surely falls over Archer, which takes place in a world strangely out of time (the bad guys are typically Russian or Eastern European even though the technology is clearly post-Cold War) and embraces certain Ian Fleming-era anachronisms such as casual sexism and xenophobia – both rendered ridiculous by their sheer blatancy. There is also something decidedly retro about the show's aesthetics, from its Saul Bass-inspired opening titles to the vaguely Hanna-Barbera-ish animation, which eschews fluidity in favour of elegant character designs and brilliantly tactile backdrops.

Story continues below advertisement

The show's central joke is that the people charged with maintaining life-and-death matters of national security are unstable and unreliable, which is also the theme of Homeland. The difference is that Archer is absurd and cartoony on purpose.

Report an error
About the Author

Adam Nayman is a contributing editor for Cinema Scope and writes on film for Montage, Sight and Sound, Reverse Shot and Cineaste. He is a lecturer at Ryerson and the University of Toronto and his first book, a critical study of Paul Verhoeven's SHOWGIRLS, will be published in 2014 by ECW Press. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨