Skip to main content

Andrew Chang was only a few minutes into anchoring The National on CBC the other evening when readers were onto me with opinions: "He seems very nice." And, "He seems agitated."

In homes and cottages and, probably, at Tim Hortons across Canada, the post-Mansbridge future of The National is being discussed with vim and vigour. Or so it seems.

Recently, I wrote about the mail I'd received, unprompted, on the matter, calling it a "small obsession" in Canada. And I invited more feedback. Well, it was a deluge. This thing is big and getting bigger.

Story continues below advertisement

The stakes are high, obviously. People who watch the darn thing might have to put up with the new anchor, or gaggle of new anchors, for years to come. They don't want to be rolling their eyes nightly. Can't blame them.

John Doyle: It's about time: We've put up with Mansbridge and his pompous ilk for too long

From the archives: CBC's Peter Mansbridge: What happens 'when forever comes'

Ian Hanomansing is the favoured candidate for countless readers of this great newspaper and this little column. Female readers often refer to him as "Ian Handsomeman" or "Ian Handsomemanthing." Who am I to pass judgment on such drollery? Canadians are Canadians and the giddying glories of our culture are sacred.

Rosemary Barton deeply impressed many readers during her week on The National and there were assertions, contrary to what was said here in this column, that hardly anybody watches Power & Politics on CBC News Network. (And they don't appreciate being called "fanatics" for politics.) Some readers detected a mischievous personality in Barton, but opinion was very divided on her interview with Omar Khadr. That can be put down to a rather fractious countrywide division of opinion on that whole matter.

There was a surge of support for Diana Swain and some readers were simply outraged that her name was not mentioned in the first place. "A first-rate journalist, with plenty of smarts and poise," is the gist of many opinions. Lack of pretension was also noted in the matter of Swain. This is an interesting point. Readers feel they can detect pomposity and self-importance instantly, and will not put up with that sort of attitude. In Canada, it seems, you can get chucked out of the house for putting on airs. Or, people change the channel.

Heather Hiscox and Mark Kelley got good reviews, although Kelley irritates the heck out of some viewers by gesticulating too much and appearing to be on the point of leaping out of his chair – if he has a chair to sit in, which isn't always the case at CBC News. Andrew Nichols was put forward by some readers for his "youthfulness."

Story continues below advertisement

Yours truly put forward the name Nil Koksal, which went over well. "Very good choice" was an almost instant response. Adrienne Arsenault was also promoted by many readers.

Mind you, it's with a heavy heart I report that the amount of critical attention given to women TV journalists and anchors on their hair, clothes and tone of voice was disheartening. Yet the wave of response to my recent column also made it clear that constant viewers of The National want a woman anchoring the program as part of the team.

Many readers in Ontario put forward the name Steve Paikin, the veteran host of The Agenda on TVOntario. As I told many in reply, it seems unlikely he would want to leave TVO for the high-octane, high-pressure shenanigans of The National. Also, The National doesn't offer a chair to sit in. Still, he has numerous supporters.

As for Andrew Chang, who is on The National this week, reaction was swift, if polarizing. Some readers worship him and perceive him as both calm and cheerful. Others see him as a "performer" with his many hand gestures and raised eyebrows. It's a fair bet that he's entering the sweepstakes, as CBC seems to be auditioning anchors during these summer months. But I urge you – no wagering, please.

More than a few readers expressed understandable surprise that CBC has yet to find a solo replacement for Pastor Mansbridge or settled on a replacement team. After all, as was pointed out to me, the Pastor announced his departure last September. Several readers expressed the dark suspicion that the real search for a replacement could only start after he had left. Don't even go there, people.

Given Mansbridge's legendary start in the broadcasting racket, the most shrewd reader response to my recent column can be summarized as this: "CBC should be scouring the outlying airports of the nation for the sound of someone making announcements about lost luggage and delayed flights. You never know …"

Story continues below advertisement

Feel free to pass that on in the homes, cottages and Tims of this great country. Let the auditions and the feedback continue. What summer larks we're having.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter