Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

The wisest comment made so far about plans to review Canada's cultural policies and bring them into line with our digital age came from former heritage minister James Moore: "The vast majority of the public pressure is toward maximizing consumer freedom and choice, while all of the stakeholder pressure is toward subsidizing the creation of content or regulating the distribution of that content to the consumer. These are two worlds that often collide."

Moore's assessment is that of a former Conservative cabinet minister, but it isn't partisan. It's simply pragmatic. Changing Canadian broadcast and content regulations is a hellish task. The public feels very differently from the industry, and the creative side of the industry, especially in TV, doesn't really want creativity – it wants jobs. It is implausible that all sides will agree on a paradigm that benefits everybody. Even more unlikely is the sudden emergence of great Canadian television.

Since the Liberal government's first aim is to get re-elected, it's fair to assume that the sweeping review will primarily benefit consumers. But what most consumers want is to pay as little as possible, for as much choice as possible. If TV content can be obtained for free, all the better. The public is largely clueless about copyright and territorial rights to TV series. All that seems just so old-school, so pre-digital. If the plan is to allow people to pay less and possibly pay nothing, then the TV industry as we know it now, not just in Canada, will collapse. The Golden Age of TV will be over and while consumers crow about getting access for free, there will inevitably be less to see.

Story continues below advertisement

What is on the horizon, a worst-case scenario when existing regulations are demolished, is a TV industry as weakened by the digital age as the music industry. It's common these days to cite YouTube as the successor to traditional TV; creating new generations of stars and giving freedom to performers. All true on the surface, but the performers are asking, "Where's the money?"

Tuesday of this week was "World IP Day," to mark the creation of the World Intellectual Property Organization. It was in fact marked by artists such as Debbie Harry of Blondie complaining loudly and with reason that YouTube is a low-paying exploitative international racket. Writing for The Guardian, Harry pointed out: "In fact, it is estimated by the American Association of Independent Music that YouTube pays only a sixth of what Apple and Spotify pay artists." And, as we all know, Apple and Spotify aren't exactly keeping the music industry afloat in the way it was previously buoyant.

YouTube is owned by Google, an outfit whose 2015 revenue was $75-billion (U.S.). It got to that revenue level by not paying artists what they are worth.

As for the business end of the Canadian TV industry, most of the major players would rather go back to the pre-Internet days than adapt to the digital age. The business model then was peachy – buy American network series, simulcast them, make a fortune and grudgingly produce and air Canadian content, as required by licence regulation. They have been extremely slow to adapt. It is a fact that while Canadian TV was ignoring the Internet, Canadian newspapers such as the one you're reading were steaming ahead with online innovation. The Canadian industry will be dragged kicking and screaming into the digital age and will offer the current Canadian Heritage Minister, Mélanie Joly, her biggest push-back. With little institutional history of innovation and being slow to evolve, the players are probably terrified.

The other major stakeholder, and the one to which Joly has probably been listening, is the creative side of television. Good luck in dealing with the guilds and other organizations that represent that arena. They want money and jobs. While television has become the most vital storytelling medium of our age, those who make it in Canada prioritize jobs – any kind of job – over true creativity. As long as there is more money to pay mortgages, they're happy. If the recalibration of Cancon rules means yet more of the usual mediocrity, they're happy too.

Nobody can legislate excellence into existence. Certainly not the Heritage Minister. But it can be encouraged, and a start would be clearing all the various funding agencies of narrow-minded bureaucrats and replacing them with people who have a history of creating or recognizing innovation and excellence. Replace the rule makers with rule breakers and don't let anyone get too comfortable in the job.

It's as plain as a poke in your eye that something needs to change. Coming soon to Global is Private Eyes, which stars Jason Priestley as "a former hockey star who gets a second chance as a P.I." I haven't seen it and I don't really want to see it. My heart sinks at the synopsis. It ticks all the boxes in grudgingly contrived Canadian content – the Canadian actor who was in a hit U.S. show gets the starring role, it's a private-eye drama, presumably about solving crimes, and there's a hockey connection. It sounds as though it was dreamed up solely to conform to funding requirements.

Story continues below advertisement

That sinking feeling about Canadian content has to be banished, but getting to that point is setting out on the road to hell. Good luck to all.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies