Skip to main content

Jillian Vanstone and Skylar Campbell are well matched in this year’s production of the National Ballet’s The Nutcracker.

Aleksandar Antonijevic

Written by
Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky (music), James Kudelka (choreography and libretto)
Genre
Dance
Music
Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky
Company
The National Ballet of Canada
Venue
Four Seasons Centre for the Performing Arts
City
Toronto
Year
2013
Runs Until
Saturday, January 04, 2014

The National Ballet of Canada premiered James Kudelka's The Nutcracker in 1995, which makes it just two years shy of 20 years old. How does this production manage to stay so watchable?

Well, for starters, it is action-packed. There is always something going on in terms of choreography. No one packs in movement to each bar of music like Kudelka. Second, there are the sumptuous sets and costumes by Santo Loquasto that anchor the ballet in the Russia of composer Tchaikovsky. One never gets tired of the gorgeous look of the piece.

Kudelka designed his Nutcracker to have a moral, so he just doesn't have a young girl go on a magic journey with her Nutcracker doll. Rather, it is battling siblings, Marie (Olivia McAlpine) and her brother Misha (Eamon Stocks) who travel with the Nutcracker. The two learn to get along during their adventures.

Story continues below advertisement

Over the years, it has become obvious that having a young boy as one of the leads is a great draw to young boys in terms of audience. Kudelka's version has punch far beyond the attraction the usual Nutcrackers have for little wannabe ballerinas.

There is also humour, and lots of it. The first time the motorized rat races across the stage still gives the audience a thrill, including this writer. And then there are the dancing bears, a performing horse, and chubby little chefs chasing runaway chickens.

For someone like myself who has seen the ballet countless times, the trick is to find a performance with people I haven't seen before. Sunday afternoon featured Skylar Campbell making his debut at Peter the stable boy (who becomes the Nutcracker doll), and Jillian Vanstone (Sugar Plum Fairy), the most underrated and underused principal dancer at the National.

Traditionally, The Nutcracker has been used as a showcase for emerging artists. A good performance in this ballet can really help propel a dancer to the next level. Campbell's rise in the company has been a quick one.

The California-born dancer joined the National as an apprentice in 2009, became a corps member in 2011 and was promoted to second soloist in 2013. It has been clear from the roles he's been given that artistic director Karen Kain is very interested in him.

Campbell is slender and elegant, with an ease of delivery. Everything about his dancing is fluid and effortless. There is nothing of a Flash Harry in him. He doesn't produce thrills like some of his go-for-the-jugular colleagues. Rather, his movement is clean and precise, which makes for a very satisfying performance (although he did over-rotate a couple of times, probably due to nerves).

Usually, the princes in the making are broken in by seasoned ballerinas. Born in Nanaimo, B.C., Vanstone joined the company in 1999, and finally made it to principal dancer in 2011. She and Campbell are a good match because they have a similar look.

Story continues below advertisement

Vanstone is a great classicist who makes tricky footwork look like child's play.

Her presence on stage is one of lyrical grace. Like Campbell, she is not showy. Both hide their formidable technique within the performance. Character comes first, not tricks.

Another new person for me is China-born Rui Huang, who joined the company in 2011. She performed the Bee in Nutcracker. The role is a Kudelka invention which he threw into the famous Waltz of the Flowers to complicate an already complex ensemble piece. Huang buzzed around, mostly in the air, with lovely, high jumps. She's another to watch.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter