Skip to main content

Alberta made more than $1.5-billion in accounting errors around a series of its energy deals in the 2019-20 financial year, including crude by rail, the Keystone pipeline expansion and the Sturgeon Refinery, according to the provincial Auditor-General.

Doug Wylie released his audit of the province’s 2019-20 financial reports Thursday, noting the level of error was “significant,” and the largest he could recall during his two decades in the office.

“In a financial statement audit you will always have observations, but in this particular year, these are significant errors that were found,” Mr. Wylie said, calling the mistakes “concerning.”

Story continues below advertisement

Assistant Auditor-General Brad Ireland told The Globe and Mail he has seen tens of millions of dollars of adjustments in past audits, in some cases running up to $100-million.

“But this year, what was different was definitely the magnitude. The volume of adjustments was probably similar to what we had in the past, but the magnitude of those items was definitely much larger than anything that I can remember,” he said.

The $1.5-billion in energy errors all involve the Alberta Petroleum Marketing Commission, or APMC, an arm’s-length body under the guidance of the Ministry of Energy. Kavi Bal, press secretary to Energy Minister Sonya Savage, told The Globe in an e-mail that all of the procedural accounting errors identified in the Auditor-General’s report have been fully addressed and corrected.

The APMC oversees a range of energy strategies, including divesting the province from $3.7-billion worth of contracts signed by the former NDP government for rail cars, loading and unloading capacity, logistics and other services. The crude-by-rail deal would have seen the province lease thousands of railcars to increase export capacity, thus relieving the pressure on limited pipeline space.

The United Conservative Party was critical of the deal and pledged during the 2019 election that it would rip up the contracts if it won, which it did.

In February this year, Premier Jason Kenney announced that 19 contracts were being finalized for divestment by APMC. But just eight had been sold, even though the ministry accounted for the program as if all the contracts had been divested for $1.43-billion.

“This accounting approach did not reflect the economic reality” that 11 contracts were still active, Mr. Wylie wrote – a $637-million mistake. He also noted the ministry didn’t have all the pertinent information about the rail contracts, and found that APMC inaccurately said two agreements were amended, when they hadn’t been.

Story continues below advertisement

The provincial government’s investment in the Keystone XL pipeline expansion also drew the Auditor-General’s attention.

Alberta announced in March it would contribute US$1.1-billion to gain an ownership stake in the pipeline, which it plans to sell back to the company after commercial operations begin. It will also guarantee US$4.2-billion of debt related to the 1,947-kilometre project.

However, Mr. Wylie wrote in his report, neither the Energy Ministry nor APMC performed analyses to assess accounting implications of the Keystone deal, and failed to note an initial contribution of approximately $100-million was actually due March 31.

“As a result,” he wrote, “APMC’s assets and liabilities were understated.”

Then there’s the Sturgeon Refinery, a $10-billion government-backed refinery besieged by delays and cost overruns, which has been a thorn in the side of three successive Alberta governments.

The refinery has been the focus of past audits. This time, Mr. Wylie found APMC failed to update the “onerous" refinery contract given the “significant impacts” on oil price and demand related to COVID-19, a Saudi-Russia price war and wildly fluctuating price forecasts.

Story continues below advertisement

“After we requested APMC update the model based on more current information,” he wrote, the commission had to adjust its books by $795-million. The report also found calculation errors around sunk costs and a diesel pricing methodology, which resulted in additional changes.

“Given the magnitude and complexity of the transactions at the Ministry of Energy, it is important for both APMC and the department adhere to existing controls in place to ensure that the government’s financial statements are not materially misstated,” Mr. Wylie wrote.

The report also took aim at the government’s oil and gas war room, officially branded the Canadian Energy Centre.

Mr. Wylie’s office found the arm’s-length body awarded numerous sole-sourced contracts with little transparency or oversight, including no documents detailing why vendors were chosen, whether they had conflicts of interest and why the war room failed to use a public tender process. The report also cited three separate occasions on which contractors began running up expenses before contracts were signed off by the board.

Mr. Bal, Ms. Savage’s press secretary, said in the e-mail that the largest contract was $600,000 for an “urgent national ad campaign for the Teck Frontier mine proposal” that required a tight turnaround. When the Frontier project was withdrawn, he said, the planned campaign was rolled into a different national ad strategy.

Mr. Wylie told The Globe that Thursday’s report underscored the importance of having – and following – sound financial control processes, particularly as the Alberta government tries to resuscitate the flailing provincial economy.

Story continues below advertisement

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies