Skip to main content

Mark Wiseman speaks at the Reuters Global Investment Outlook Summit in New York on Nov. 16, 2017.

Mike Segar/Reuters

Mark Wiseman’s ouster from investment giant BlackRock Inc. over his failure to disclose an affair with a colleague marks an abrupt exit for one of the most powerful Canadians on Wall Street.

Mr. Wiseman left his senior post at the world’s largest asset manager on Thursday because he had a relationship with a colleague who reported to him. An internal memo sent to employees by chairman Larry Fink and president Rob Kapito said Mr. Wiseman violated the firm’s policy on workplace relationships.

Mr. Wiseman had been global head of active equities at BlackRock and chairman of the firm’s alternative-investing operations prior to his departure. His wife, Marcia Moffat, runs BlackRock’s Canadian operations.

Story continues below advertisement

“I am leaving BlackRock because in recent months I engaged in a consensual relationship with one of our colleagues without reporting it as required by BlackRock’s Relationships at Work Policy,” Mr. Wiseman wrote in an internal memo. “I regret my mistake and I accept responsibility for my actions.” He did not reply to a request for comment.

Related: Office relationships are costing a growing number of top executives their jobs

The departure marks a swift and stunning reversal of fortune for a man who had risen to the top echelons of the global investment business. A lawyer by training, he has clerked for Beverley McLachlin at the Supreme Court of Canada and worked at blue-chip law firm Sullivan & Cromwell in New York and Paris. He moved into private capital in 2000 and made a name for himself during a four-year stint in the private equity investing group at Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan.

Mr. Wiseman joined Canada Pension Plan Investment Board in 2005 and was instrumental in increasing the fund’s investments in alternative assets such as infrastructure and real estate. He also pushed for increasing the fund’s investment risk tolerance – a departure from its roots investing almost exclusively in ultrasafe government bonds. “If we don’t lose money in investments, we’re not taking enough risk," he told The Globe and Mail in 2012.

While at CPPIB, Mr. Wiseman deepened his personal relationship with BlackRock’s Mr. Fink, and the two worked together on a group called Focusing Capital on the Long-Term that was created to preach long-term thinking for major investors. He joined BlackRock soon after, trading a pension fund that now manages $409-billion for a company that manages US$6.8-trillion.

Although the relationship that led to his exit was consensual, Mr. Wiseman did not report it internally. The company has had a long-standing requirement that “any employee involved in a romantic relationship with another BlackRock employee report this relationship to their managers and human resources so that any concerns about fairness and/or conflicts of interest can be addressed,” its human-resources policy says.

The policy applies to people in every geographic region, department or rank within the organization, and requires the company to evaluate a relationship once it is reported, according to someone familiar with its application. The Globe is keeping the source confidential because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

The identity of the woman involved with Mr. Wiseman has not been disclosed, and BlackRock would not comment on her role at the company, or whether she was also required to leave.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Moffat joined BlackRock’s Canadian arm in 2015, one year before Mr. Wiseman. Before that, she was a senior-vice president at Royal Bank of Canada. She declined to comment on Thursday.

Relationships at work have become a hot topic in recent years, as more senior executives have lost their jobs for romantic relationships with subordinates. In November, McDonald’s Corp. fired its chief executive for engaging in a consensual relationship with an employee that violated company policy.

Stuart Rudner, an employment lawyer and mediator in Toronto, says he advises corporate clients against imposing blanket bans on workplace relationships.

“We spend most of our time at work and a lot of our relationships are based around work. Practically speaking, it’s not really feasible to ban relationships,” he said, adding that he advises clients instead to implement policies that address any conflicts of interest that could arise, particularly where there is a power imbalance between the employees.

Recent court rulings show that in cases where employees fail to disclose a relationship, companies will have stronger grounds to dismiss them with cause, Mr. Rudner said. “It’s not because of the relationship. It’s usually because of a combination of a breach of policy and dishonesty as well,” he added.

Mr. Wiseman’s exit marks the second time this year that BlackRock has fired an executive committee member. In July, Jeff Smith, the former head of global human resources, left after 10 years with the company when he failed to adhere to a company policy.

Story continues below advertisement

In their memo to employees on Thursday, Mr. Fink and Mr. Kapito said BlackRock’s corporate culture has been one of its greatest strengths.

"It is deeply disappointing that two senior executives have departed the firm in the same year because of their personal conduct,” the memo said. “This is not who BlackRock is. This is not our culture. We expect every employee to uphold the highest standards of behavior. This is especially critical for our senior leaders.”

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies