Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A motorist fills their Toyota Mirai, a hydrogen-powered car, at a gas station in Torrance, Calif. on Oct. 22, 2020.

Philip Cheung/The New York Times News Service

A collection of environmental and non-profit groups is warning Ottawa against using federal dollars to bolster Canada’s fossil-fuel hydrogen industry, arguing doing so amounts to subsidies for the oil and gas sector.

The federal government has been working on a hydrogen strategy for three years, following in the footsteps of dozens of countries in Europe and Asia as it eyes the fuel source to help Canada get to net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. That strategy was due for release in the summer, but Ottawa now says it will likely be released this coming month.

Hydrogen as a fuel source is enjoying unprecedented global momentum. It is light, storable, energy-dense and produces no direct emissions of pollutants or greenhouse gases – a boon for countries pursuing net-zero goals. Countries have spent or earmarked billions of dollars to accelerate hydrogen technologies, and Canada’s federal government is expected to attach funding to its own plan.

Story continues below advertisement

Provinces are also figuring out how hydrogen can fit into their future energy mix. Last week, the Ontario government released a discussion paper on the development of a provincial hydrogen strategy, following Alberta, British Columbia and Quebec, which have all made a push to pursue hydrogen.

But in a letter to Natural Resources Minister Seamus O’Regan, the group comprising 27 signatories (including Environmental Defence Canada, Greenpeace, the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment and Oxfam Canada) says funding technologies for hydrogen derived from natural gas would be a fossil-fuel subsidy and goes against Canada’s G7 and G20 commitments.

“To the extent that any public resources are available for hydrogen development, they should be reserved for renewable hydrogen for the hardest-to-decarbonize sectors that do not have viable decarbonization alternatives. Canada should not be providing any form of financial support for the development of fossil-fuel derived hydrogen,” they wrote.

The group’s main bone of contention is the federal government’s inclusion of so-called blue hydrogen in its strategy.

Blue hydrogen is created by extracting hydrogen from natural gas, then capturing and storing the resulting carbon dioxide through carbon capture and sequestration, or CCS. It’s in that realm where Alberta, which already uses CCS, wants to make its mark in a world focused on net-zero emissions.

Green hydrogen, on the other hand, is created by using renewable power to split the hydrogen atom from water via electrolysis.

The group argues there is “little evidence” that blue hydrogen, which it labels “fossil-fuel hydrogen,” can make a meaningful and cost-effective contribution to achieving a zero emissions economy, relying as it does on what the group calls the “unproven technology” of CCS.

Story continues below advertisement

But Mr. O’Regan has been clear that both blue and green hydrogen will be a part of the coming federal strategy. He told The Globe and Mail over the summer that his government would be “foolish not to look at blue,” given that Canada is the world’s fourth-largest producer of natural gas and has established expertise in CCS.

The International Energy Agency also argues that carbon capture technologies – and their integration with fuels like hydrogen – will be a crucial part of the world’s transition to a net-zero future.

Mr. O’Regan’s press secretary, Ian Cameron, did not respond to the group’s criticism, saying only that “hydrogen fuel and technology will be an important part of Canada’s clean energy future, and a source of economic growth and thousands of new jobs.”

“We look forward to sharing our strategy with Canadians soon,” he said in an e-mail.

Not everyone is welcoming hydrogen with open arms.

Saskatchewan Energy and Resources Minister Bronwyn Eyre says governments must take a cautious approach when considering subsidies or royalty credits for the industry.

Story continues below advertisement

During a recent virtual event hosted by the Canadian Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors, Ms. Eyre said the excitement around hydrogen is largely being driven by media and people who are “skeptical about oil and gas.”

Governments must be careful not to “go full throttle” on hydrogen and other burgeoning technologies, she said, or risk depleting provincial coffers.

“We have to be very careful that the hype isn’t about assuaging those voices,” she said. “It’s been important to us that government money follows – it doesn’t lead. Because that way it allows companies to do something innovative, put their own money forward, and then we’ll cautiously assess.”

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies