Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

A pumpjack works at a well head on an oil and gas installation near Cremona, Alta., on Oct. 29, 2016.

Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian Press

Calfrac Well Services Ltd. plans to swap about $510-million of its debt for equity in a court-supervised restructuring that will leave its shareholders with a small fraction of their stake in the struggling oil field services stalwart.

Calgary-based Calfrac also revealed that its largest shareholder and long-time antagonist, Wilks Brothers LLC of Cisco, Tex., floated two offers in June for its U.S. operations in exchange for the debt Wilks holds and some cash. The Calfrac board rejected the bids, arguing they undervalued the business and would mean jettisoning two-thirds of the company’s operations.

The two sides have been battling each other in court since 2018, when Calfrac accused Wilks, which is controlled by two billionaire brothers, of breaching a non-disclosure agreement with the goal of driving up borrowing costs so it could snap up Calfrac’s U.S. fracking business. A judge ruled in Calfrac’s favour last year, but the financial damages and costs have yet to be settled.

Story continues below advertisement

The developments highlight current as well as long-standing problems at Calfrac, one of the best known names in Canadian oil field services. The company provides such services as hydraulic fracturing, coiled tubing and cementing, all used to stimulate production from oil and gas wells.

Its financial health is dependent on capital expenditures by energy companies, and virtually all of them eliminated spending in the spring to deal with the oil price crash. The recapitalization is being done under the Canada Business Corporations Act, which allows it to restructure and continue paying its bills without seeking bankruptcy protection.

The company’s operations have recovered somewhat in recent weeks with crews back in the field in Canada and the United States, and it has cut costs, said Scott Treadwell, vice-president of capital markets and strategy at Calfrac.

“But the amount of activity is not enough to sustain the industry, let alone any company in the industry, so it needs to continue to get better,” Mr. Treadwell said.

Calfrac shares tumbled 15 per cent to 14 cents on the Toronto Stock Exchange on Tuesday. They have lost 93 per cent of their value in the past year, with the most severe drop occurring in March as energy and stock markets roiled because of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

At Tuesday’s closing price, Calfrac has a market capitalization of about $20-million. That compares with more than $610-million five years ago.

Under the recapitalization plan, holders of Calfrac’s senior unsecured debt would get shares in the company in exchange for what they are owed. Calfrac will also issue $60-million in new notes, which will rank above second-lien debt, to a group that includes G2S2 Capital Inc., some existing debt holders and Matco Investments, which is owned by Calfrac executive chairman Ron Mathison.

Story continues below advertisement

Second-lien debt holders, meanwhile, would see no change in their holdings. Besides holding nearly 20 per cent of Calfrac stock, Wilks has about half of the second-lien debt.

After the recapitalization, the company will have cut its long-term debt by $570-million and its annual debt-service costs by $52-million, it said. Current shareholders will see their stake in the company cut to just 8 per cent, however. In addition, the new debt will be convertible into shares later.

Reached by phone, Wilks Brothers representative Matt Wilks said he had no comment on the developments at Calfrac. He is also chief financial officer of the family investment firm’s own fracking company, ProFrac Services.

The firm is run by Dan and Farris Wilks, who are active investors in the energy sector and big supporters of U.S. conservative political causes. They were among the largest donors to Texas Republican Senator Ted Cruz’s unsuccessful bid for the White House in 2016.

Wilks bought into Calfrac in 2016 and increased its interest to where it is now its largest shareholder. Two years ago, it shifted its status from passive to activist investor, pitting itself against management and their board.

Calfrac said on Tuesday that its board elected not to support the Wilks takeover bids for the U.S. operations because first-lien lenders would be left with just a third of the collateral and no debt reduction. Also, the remaining business would be left with a disproportionate amount of debt.

Story continues below advertisement

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Follow related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies