Skip to main content

Canadian Tire chairperson Maureen Sabia is seen during the company's annual general meeting in Toronto, Ontario, May 8, 2014.

Kevin Van Paassen/The Globe and Mail

Canada's big family-controlled companies continue to be winners for their investors, outperforming widely held corporations despite lingering shareholder criticism of the dual-class stock structures most of them have.

A new study by National Bank of Canada tracking the performance of 43 major family-controlled firms countrywide found they tallied an absolute return of 206 per cent over a 13-year span from June, 2005, to June, 2018, besting the 133-per-cent return for the S&P/TSX Composite Index. The companies, which include corporate pillars such as Onex Corp. as well as budding newcomers such as Shopify Inc. and Knight Therapeutics Inc., returned 9 per cent on an annualized basis over this time versus 6.7 per cent for the TSX Composite, the research found.

Family companies with unequal voting rights have been the subject of debate for decades, with some critics predicting they would eventually be pushed to the margins by public corporations run by professional managers with greater power to raise capital and generate profit. The fear persists that such dual-class shares will erode the long-term integrity of markets by letting business founders run roughshod over other investors.

Story continues below advertisement

But the bank's research suggests that family firms, in Canada at least, are not only surviving, but thriving, as they try to balance the interests of their stakeholders. If senior U.S. regulator Robert Jackson Jr. warned earlier this year of special classes of stock entrenching "corporate royalty" in perpetuity, National Bank's study suggests Canada's kings and queens are making money for everyone while trying to improve governance.

"You have to have a controlling shareholder that's confident enough to want to be challenged on everything and a board that has the courage and willingness to step up," said Maureen Sabia, chairperson of Canadian Tire Corp., part of the National Bank proprietary family index.

Directors who take the time to deeply understand the business and get involved in strategy are better positioned than shareholder activists to address the concerns of investors, Ms. Sabia said in an interview with The Globe and Mail. "You can't know, from the outside, however much you study the company, as much as the insiders know."

"To me, the most important factor here is the tenure of management of family-owned companies," said Serge Godin, founder and executive chairman of Montreal-based CGI Inc., Canada's biggest IT services company, which he controls through a special class of stock.

The chief executives currently in charge of the 100 largest family businesses in the United States have already served an average of 13 years compared with the typical CEO tenure of five years, according to research by Forbes. The situation in Canada is thought to be similar.

"When you have 13 years, those people have much more time to master their environment, to master their competition," Mr. Godin said. "I don't think it's a matter of competence. I think it's really a matter of longevity."

Family businesses, defined by National Bank as a founding family controlling at least 10 per cent of the voting rights or a non-founder controlling a third or more of the voting rights, are playing the long game, the study's authors say. In that sense, they're simply more profitable because they're thinking way ahead and they want their directors and managers to think that way, too.

Story continues below advertisement

At a time when fewer companies are going public, in part because their founders don't want to fall prey to aggressive activists or get consumed by the short-term focus of markets, family-controlled companies with dual-class shares are staking out a middle ground, says Andrew Molson, a public-relations executive and director of family-held Molson Coors. That is, they're public but they're able to hold the agitators at bay.

"I look at a dual-class share structure as a mechanism that can be used in public markets to ensure that you have the presence of long-term, committed, knowledgeable shareholders," Mr. Molson said. "Maybe it's not a mechanism that's for everyone."

Montreal-based National Bank is the principal lender to several major Canadian firms that are controlled by families, including plane- and train-maker Bombardier Inc. U.S. consultancy McKinsey & Co. forecasts that, by 2025, nearly 40 per cent of the world's companies generating revenues of US$1-billion or more will be emerging-market family-owned businesses, up from 15 per cent in 2010.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter