Amid a worsening tariff battle, China is putting off accepting licence applications from American companies in financial services and other industries until Washington makes progress toward a settlement, an official of a business group said Tuesday.
The disclosure is the first public confirmation of U.S. companies’ fears that their operations in China or access to its markets might be disrupted by the battle over Beijing’s technology policy. China is running out of American imports for penalties in response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff hikes, which has prompted worries that Chinese regulators might target operations of U.S. companies.
The licence delay applies to industries Beijing has promised to open to foreign competitors, according to Jacob Parker, vice-president for China operations of the U.S.-China Business Council (USCBC). The group represents some 200 American companies that do business with China.
In meetings over the past three weeks, cabinet-level officials told USCBC representatives they are putting off accepting applications “until the trajectory of the U.S.-China relationship improves and stabilizes,” Mr. Parker said.
Chinese authorities have promised to increase foreign access to areas including banking, securities, insurance and asset management.
“There seem to be domestic political pressures that are working against the perception of U.S. companies receiving benefits” during the dispute, Mr. Parker said.
As for what improvement might entail, Mr. Parker said Chinese officials want an end to Mr. Trump’s tariff hikes and a negotiated settlement. He declined to identify the officials but, in a sign Beijing wants foreign companies to help lobby Washington, said the meetings represented “unprecedented access” for his group.
Beijing matched Mr. Trump’s earlier tariff increase on US$50-billion of imports but is running out of American goods for retaliation because of their lopsided trade balance. China bought American goods worth about US$1 for every US$3 of goods it exported to the United States.
Mr. Trump is poised to decide whether to raise duties on US$200-billion of Chinese goods. Beijing has issued a US$60-billion list of goods for retaliation.
A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman, Geng Shuang, said Monday that China will “definitely take countermeasures” if the tariff hike goes ahead.
Economists have warned Beijing might target service industries such as engineering or logistics, in which the United States runs a trade surplus with China.
Chinese commentators have suggested Beijing might use its multitrillion-dollar holdings of U.S. government debt as a weapon, although that would impose costs on China. Chinese state-controlled media have encouraged boycotts of Japanese and South Korean products in past disputes with those governments.
Beijing said in June it would impose unspecified “comprehensive measures” if necessary. That left U.S. companies on edge about whether China will use its heavily regulated economy to disrupt their operations by withholding licences or launching tax, anti-monopoly or other investigations.
Chinese leaders reject Mr. Trump’s demand to roll back official industry plans such as “Made in China 2025,” which calls for the state-led creation of global champions in robotics, artificial intelligence and other technologies.
Washington, Europe and other trading partners say those plans violate Beijing’s market-opening commitments. But Communist leaders see them as a path to prosperity and global influence.
Chinese negotiators agreed in May to narrow their multibillion-dollar trade surplus with the United States by purchasing more American soybeans and other products. Beijing scrapped that deal after Mr. Trump’s first tariff increase went ahead on July 6.
In addition to rolling back industry plans, the Trump administration wants Beijing to reduce the privileges of state-owned companies and eliminate requirements for foreign companies to hand over technology to Chinese partners.
In their meetings with the USCBC, Chinese officials expressed willingness to buy more American exports, but “showed no appetite at all” to talk about industry reform, technology policy or other U.S. priorities, Mr. Parker said.
“I don’t consider that to be very positive for any kind of negotiated outcome in the short term or medium term,” he said.
Chinese regulators have shown their willingness to attack foreign companies in disputes with other governments.
Last year, Beijing destroyed South Korean retailer Lotte Corp.’s business in China after it sold a golf course in South Korea to the country’s government for construction of a missile-defence system opposed by Chinese leaders.
Beijing closed most of Lotte’s 99 supermarkets and other outlets in China. Seoul and Beijing later mended relations, but Lotte gave up and sold its China operations.