Skip to main content

Chinese aluminum foil producer Shantou Wanshun Package Material Stock Co. on Monday said its subsidiary is suing the United States over twin anti-dumping and anti-subsidy duties Washington imposed on its shipments.

In a statement to the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, Wanshun said Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials, which was hit with a countervailing duty of 17.14 per cent and an anti-dumping duty of 37.99 per cent earlier this year, had filed a lawsuit with the U.S. Court of International Trade.

Zhongji was among the Chinese foil companies that unsuccessfully filed a joint “no injury” claim with the U.S. International Trade Commission last year as Washington probed whether the companies were unfairly subsidized, and is now trying to reverse the duties on its own.

Story continues below advertisement

The total duties of 55.13 per cent on Zhongji’s foil were the lowest imposed on Chinese foil makers, Wanshun’s board secretary Huang Wei said. This shows the U.S. side had taken some of its arguments into account, she said.

“But there are still some unreasonable elements inside” the ruling, she said.

Ms. Huang pointed to the United States comparing the prices of China’s aluminum foil exports to South Africa as a reference case. The stock exchange filing noted that Bulgaria would have been a more appropriate choice.

The document made no mention of damages being sought, but Ms. Huang said she hoped the United States would remove the twin duties.

Aluminum has been a focal point of the U.S.-China trade row, with Washington calling on China, the world’s top producer of the metal, to rein in excess production capacity.

U.S. President Donald Trump imposed a broad 10-per-cent import duty on aluminum imports from China and other countries from March 23.

“We will still export to the United States,” Ms. Huang said. Even after the double duties, “our customers still came back to buy” because of favourable pricing, she added.

Story continues below advertisement

A search of the U.S. Court of International Trade website showed Jiangsu Zhongji had filed a case against the United States in June, but the full document was unavailable.

Associated defendants named in the stock exchange filing were the Aluminum Association Trade Enforcement Working Group and its individual members, as well as JW Aluminum Co., Novelis Corp. and Reynolds Consumer Products.

The U.S. Aluminum Association, which had previously hailed the twin tariffs as a victory for U.S. foil producers and rules-based trade, said it was confident the duties would be upheld.

“We will work vigorously, along with the individual member companies that participated in the investigation, to defend the government’s unanimous finding that U.S. industry has been materially injured by unfairly traded imports of certain aluminum foil from China,” a spokesman said in a statement.

The other parties could not immediately be reached for comment outside of business hours in the United States.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.