Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

The CIBC at Commerce Court in Toronto, seen on Jan. 30, 2020.

Christopher Katsarov/The Globe and Mail

An Ontario court has ruled that Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce broke federal labour law by allowing employees to work unpaid overtime for years, bringing one of the country’s largest class-action lawsuits closer to resolution after it has dragged on for more than a decade.

The Ontario Superior Court found CIBC liable for unpaid overtime, but has yet to calculate the damages that will be awarded to the plaintiffs. The class action, launched in 2007, involves about 31,000 CIBC employees who worked as tellers or in other front-line customer service roles between 1993 and 2009.

In a decision released Monday, Justice Edward Belobaba found that CIBC’s bankwide policies on overtime failed to record actual hours of work by thousands of front-line staff, and illegally put the onus on employees to get overtime hours preauthorized by managers. As a result, some staff worked unpaid overtime, Justice Belobaba wrote, while the bank ignored concerns raised repeatedly in employee surveys.

Story continues below advertisement

“There is an abundance of evidence ... that some of the class action members worked uncompensated overtime," he wrote in his reasons for the decision.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs have cast the suit as the largest employment class-action lawsuit ever brought in Canada, and had asked the court for $600-million in damages. And while they are claiming victory, and suggesting the ruling sets a precedent that could affect employers across Canada, Justice Belobaba warned that the plaintiffs still face “significant challenges” in establishing what damages or remedies CIBC should be forced to pay.

“This is a battle that’s been going on for almost 13 years, and we don’t have any illusion that it’s over yet. But it’s a huge victory for the hard-working employees of CIBC, and for other employees across the country," said Louis Sokolov, a partner at Sotos LLP, a law firm representing the plaintiffs.

Assessing damages is expected to take months. Lawyers will pore over CIBC records and do statistical sampling, if necessary, to estimate the total unpaid overtime, and must argue over limitations that could curb the number of years the lawsuit would cover.

“We’re reviewing the decision and assessing next steps, including the possibility of an appeal," said CIBC spokeswoman Trish Tervit. "We believe we have effective overtime policies and practices in place, including a clear overtime policy that is easily accessible.”

While CIBC’s policies allowed for overtime if employees worked more than eight hours a day or 37.5 hours a week, they required that overtime pay be preapproved, except in “extenuating circumstances." That was too restrictive and violated provisions in the Canada Labour Code that require employers to pay overtime if they “require or permit” it, according to the court.

“I think it’s a huge precedent," said David O’Connor, a partner at Roy O’Connor LLP, another of the three law firms representing the plaintiffs. “I think it will influence employers, and should influence employers across the country.”

Story continues below advertisement

The lead plaintiff, teller Dara Fresco, and other CIBC employees said in affidavits that while overtime was expected at the bank, asking for compensation was discouraged, and that preapproval for overtime wages was difficult to get. An appeal court also previously found that willingness to work overtime was viewed positively in performance assessments, which made employees wary of claiming overtime for fear it might affect their jobs.

CIBC also did not have a system for recording the overtime hours employees work, except in exceptional cases, which Justice Belobaba said was a “systemic deficiency."

“If an employer is told of the existence of numerous complaints about unpaid overtime, does nothing in response, and simply ‘looks the other way,’ the employer is effectively permitting the employees to work overtime," he wrote. “The bank dropped the ball, to be sure.”

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies