Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Toronto investment dealer Cormark Securities Inc. has agreed to pay US$800,000 to settle U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission claims that it repeatedly mislabelled trades on behalf of a hedge-fund client.

Between August, 2016, and October, 2017, Cormark facilitated US$660-million worth of share sales in the United States for an unnamed hedge fund using trade orders that were incorrectly labelled as “long” sales when they were in fact “short” sales.

A trade is marked “long” when the seller actually owns the stock they are selling. A trade should be marked “short” if the seller is borrowing stock to sell. Investors short-sell borrowed shares when they expect the share price to drop, allowing them to rebuy the shares at a lower price and pocket the difference.

Story continues below advertisement

Cormark mislabelled more than 200 short sales over a 14-month period, the SEC said in a settlement agreement with Cormark, published Monday. Cormark agreed to the US$800,000 penalty and a “cease and desist” order “without admitting or denying the findings” contained in the settlement.

On more than 80 occasions, the SEC settlement says, the hedge fund failed to settle the trades on schedule. This suggests that the trades were not only mislabelled, but that the hedge fund was also “naked shorting” – the practice of selling stock short without first securing shares to borrow.

Naked short-selling is illegal in the United States. The SEC settlement does not explicitly say the hedge fund was naked shorting. But it does note that the SEC trade-labelling system was designed, in part, to prevent naked shorting.

“Although Cormark made efforts to settle the hedge fund’s trades on time, the hedge fund repeatedly failed to deliver the securities it sold “long” by the scheduled settlement date during the relevant period,” the SEC settlement noted.

“In just the first month that Cormark placed “long” sale orders of [an unnamed issuer’s] stock for the hedge fund, the hedge fund failed to deliver shares to settle its trades by settlement date nine times.”

Cormark was routing the orders through a trade execution system run by ITG Canada Corp., which is now called Virtu ITG Canada Corp. According to the SEC settlement, ITG notified Cormark on a number of occasions that the hedge fund had failed to deliver the shares on time.

“Despite this, Cormark took no steps to confirm whether the hedge fund’s subsequent sale orders should be marked “long,” and simply continued to submit “long” sales on behalf of the hedge fund to ITG Canada,” the SEC settlement said.

Story continues below advertisement

In response to questions about the settlement, Cormark chief operating officer Susan Streeter said: “the SEC alleged the trades were mismarked in error, but did not allege it was done willfully.”

The settlement does say that Cormark “should have known” that its actions would lead to a violation of SEC rules.

“Cormark co-operated fully with the SEC in this investigation, and is pleased to put the matter behind it and move forward,” Ms. Streeter said. She declined to name the hedge fund in question.

ITG was also subject to a US$200,000 SEC penalty for continuing to accept mislabelled orders from Cormark.

“After repeated failures to deliver [shares], it was not reasonable for ITG Canada to continue to rely on Cormark’s order-marking information for orders to sell the securities of the Issuers absent further inquiry,” the SEC said in a separate settlement agreement published Sunday.

Short-selling is a legitimate part of capital markets, giving investors a way to bet on share prices falling. Naked shorting, on the other hand, can distort markets and lead to unfair trading.

Story continues below advertisement

As lawyers from the firm McMillan LLP wrote in a 2019 report: “Naked shorting carries with it particular risks – including an increase in failed trades, the distortion of share prices and the creation of phantom shares.”

Canadian securities regulators take a less strict line on naked shorting than the SEC. In Canada, the McMillan lawyers write, “naked shorting flies entirely under the regulatory radar unless the short fails to settle for a period of 10 trading days after the expected settlement date.”

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies