Skip to main content

An aerial view of the area proposed to be part of Sidewalk Labs Quayside development.

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

Google affiliate Sidewalks Labs LLC and development agency Waterfront Toronto have reached an agreement that would allow them to scrap Sidewalk’s plans for a high-tech Toronto neighbourhood by the end of October if concerns about the project aren’t resolved.

On Wednesday, the organizations amended their plan-development agreement to allow Waterfront Toronto’s board to terminate the arrangement and the relationship on Oct. 31 if they cannot reach a consensus on the project’s scale, the lead developer, commitments from government, and data and privacy policies.

The deadline stems from concerns Waterfront Toronto raised in late June, when Sidewalk Labs unveiled its 1,524-page draft plan for the eastern shore of Toronto’s harbour, 20 months after the organizations agreed to create a 12-acre community called Quayside together.

Story continues below advertisement

The draft plan showed Sidewalk Labs wanted to be involved in developing a parcel of land 16 times that size. Waterfront Toronto board chair Stephen Diamond wrote a letter to Sidewalk Labs calling the new scope of the proposal “premature.”

“Waterfront Toronto must first see its goals and objectives achieved at Quayside before deciding whether to work together in other areas,” he wrote.

The groups are at odds because Sidewalk wants to be the project’s lead developer, while Waterfront Toronto prefers a public procurement process, and over Sidewalk’s demand for governments to expand public transit in the area. Waterfront also has concerns about performance bonuses that would be paid to Sidewalk, and the need to rewrite municipal and provincial laws for the project to move forward. Waterfront Toronto says such requests are outside its power.

“Waterfront Toronto has been clear that there are elements of the [plan] that require commitments that we are not in a position to make," Waterfront Toronto spokesman Andrew Tumilty said in an e-mail to The Globe and Mail. "In some areas, the [plan] also goes beyond what we sought or required in the [request for proposals].

“Come October, Waterfront Toronto will evaluate where we stand, and determine what direction is in the best interest of the people of Toronto, and the Quayside project.”

On top of a termination deadline, Mr. Tumilty said Sidewalk Labs and Waterfront Toronto decided to extend the plan development agreement to March 31, 2020, to give the organizations more time to prepare. The original expiry date was Sept. 30, 2019. Since the draft plan was released, Waterfront Toronto has played host to public meetings to solicit concerns and opinions about the development.

Sidewalk Labs spokeswoman Keerthana Rang said in an e-mail to The Globe that the decision to extend the plan and set a deadline was “joint” and “a practical matter.”

Story continues below advertisement

“It made sense to create a deadline for the resolution of major outstanding issues before significant parts of that evaluation process commence,” she said.

The amendments come a week after Waterfront Toronto’s design review panel – a group of community-building experts – voted to give conditional support to the first phase of the Quayside plan, which involves developing blocks on the north side of Queens Quay, west of Small Street, which is south of the Gardiner Expressway near Parliament Street.

The panel voted not to support part of the plan involving three areas Sidewalk is calling Parliament Plaza, Parliament Slip and Silo Park.

“The project does not currently meet planning, policy and/or design excellence objectives,” said a Waterfront Toronto blog post on the vote. It also noted Sidewalk’s plan lacks “a detailed retail strategy on Queen’s Quay” and said the panel has concerns about the flexible ground-floor spaces Sidewalk has proposed.

Sidewalk says it appreciates the feedback from the panel and will have more opportunities to go before it and address the concerns.

But a group opposed to the plan said the latest developments mean “Sidewalk Labs is on its way out.”

Story continues below advertisement

“This shows that there is a lot of feedback and a lot of negative concerns raised by the [draft plan],” said Thorben Wieditz, a spokesman for BlockSidewalk, which orchestrated a petition to lobby against the project.

“We certainly hope that we’re going to end up in a situation where Sidewalk Labs will be sent home, and we can reset the process."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter