Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Two of Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd.'s biggest shareholders have weighed in on its controversial $4.9-billion bid for Detour Gold Ltd., with one wholeheartedly in favour of the transaction, and the other expressing reservations.

Eric Sprott, one of Kirkland’s top three shareholders, said he intends to vote for the all-stock acquisition.

Initially undecided, Mr. Sprott, who owns more than 13 million shares in Kirkland, said he came around after studying up on Detour and reflecting on Kirkland’s plans to boost performance at the struggling low-grade miner.

Story continues below advertisement

Kirkland says it can materially increase Detour’s production over the next few years, and slash its costs.

“I think it would be a pretty good cash-generating machine,” Mr. Sprott said of Detour.

Other top shareholders aren’t as enthused.

Joe Foster, portfolio manager with VanEck, wrote on the money manager’s website that while the big picture strategy behind the combination makes sense, he was “extremely disappointed" with the structure of the deal. The Toronto-based miner is offering 0.43 Kirkland shares for each Detour Gold share at a 24-per-cent premium, and no cash.

“Premium all-stock deals usually result in substantial declines in the acquirers’ share price," he said. "In addition, large quantities of the stock wind up in the hands of M&A arbitrageurs and can churn in the market for months, keeping further pressure on the stock.”

That exact pattern is playing out now for Kirkland. The company’s shares are down 15 per cent since the deal was announced on Nov. 25, with at least some of the pressure coming from arbitrage players, who bet the uncertainty over the deal will weigh on the share price. Such investors short-sell the stock of an acquirer -- sell borrowed shares and repay the lender with new shares they expect to get at the lower price -- and simultaneously buy and hold onto shares in the target.

After the deal was announced, many wondered why one of the world’s most profitable miners wanted to pay a 24-per-cent premium for a high-cost competitor. One analyst called it "a head-scratcher.” Kirkland shares quickly lost more than 17 per cent of their value.

Story continues below advertisement

But there is reason to believe that, in the case of Kirkland, the short selling has been particularly pronounced, with Mr. Sprott saying he has heard plenty of chatter from U.S.-based short-sellers “about what a lousy deal it is.”

VanEck’s Mr. Foster didn’t reveal whether he intends to vote for the deal, but he wrote that gold companies must find “more innovative ways of doing M&A deals that preserve and enhance value.”

The latest mergers and acquisitions in the gold industry got under way about 15 months ago, when Barrick Gold Corp. bought Randgold Resources Ltd. for US$6-billion. Unlike Kirkland’s quest for Detour, that acquisition was much more warmly received by shareholders. The facet of the deal that won the most plaudits was its no-premium structure.

Subsequent gold deals, such as Newmont Mining Corp.'s acquisition of Goldcorp Inc., and Kirkland’s bid for Detour, involve stock premiums, which is not as popular.

“It will be interesting to see if [Kirkland Lake shareholders] accept the recent loss of value in exchange for the promise of a stronger future, or whether they reject a deal structure that has destroyed value for other companies in the past,” Mr. Foster said.

VanEck is also a top-three Kirkland shareholder, with 14.5 million shares, according to Refinitiv.

Story continues below advertisement

Shareholders of Detour and Kirkland vote on the deal in January.

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies