Skip to main content

A group of shareholders at Aimia Inc. are calling for a redo of last month’s annual general meeting, which they say was “plagued with irregularities” and “outrageous conduct.”

The group, dubbed Aimia Shareholders for Accountability, said the chairman refused to conduct votes or take questions and allowed security guards to intimidate shareholders who attempted to speak, with one being “forcibly” removed.

Charles Frischer, who claimed to speak for the group – he declined to identify members – holds 1.6 per cent of the loyalty-analytics company’s outstanding shares.

Story continues below advertisement

“I have never seen this. I have attended literally hundreds of annual meetings. And I’ve only been to two that had this kind of security,” he said in an interview. “It was crazy.”

Mittleman Brothers, Aimia’s largest shareholder at more than 23 per cent, said in a statement on Wednesday that representatives “observed the same irregularities.”

“Although MB is not party to any voting or other agreement with these shareholders, we are sympathetic to their concerns raised in respect of the conduct of the AGM,” the investment firm said.

At the time of the meeting, Mittleman Brothers was subject to a standstill agreement with Aimia that required it to vote in favour of all Aimia’s director nominees and all other matters recommended unanimously by the board, the firm said.

“We note that in the absence of our support at the AGM … none of Aimia’s other director nominees – other than Phil Mittleman – would have received support from the majority of shares voted.”

Mittleman warned that Aimia should not assume continued support after the standstill agreement, which ended July 1.

Aimia said in an e-mail that the June 28 meeting was conducted “in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations” and a do-over would be “redundant.”

Story continues below advertisement

“Management and directors engaged in numerous discussions and openly answered many questions from shareholders after the meeting,” though not during, spokeswoman Karen Keyes said.

The results of the votes at the Toronto meeting were published as required by law, she added. The transcript, unlike last year, was not, with Mr. Frischer calling for its release.

“The whole purpose of this is a forum. I want to hear what Bill Smith next to me is saying,” said Mr. Frischer, who flew in from Seattle for the meeting. He acknowledged that he spoke with directors after the AGM.

Mr. Frischer also questioned whether chairman Bill McEwan held enough discretionary proxies to govern votes on all matters.

Media were told ahead of the meeting they would be barred from entering and that directors and executives would not be taking questions from reporters.

Mr. Frischer said he will call for a special meeting within 21 days if Aimia does not formally respond to the redo request he submitted this week.

Story continues below advertisement

He and others are “extremely unhappy” with Aimia’s strategic direction, he said.

“Five years ago, the stock was over $15. Today, it’s under $4. They have done a horrific job,” he said.

Aimia said directors continue to act in the best interest of stakeholders.

In January, shareholders voted nearly unanimously to approve the $450-million sale of Aimia’s Aeroplan loyalty program to Air Canada, leaving the Montreal-based company with more than $1-billion in cash, but also questions about its future.

The past two years have been turbulent for the Montreal-based company. Rupert Duchesne, Aimia’s previous CEO, stepped away from the job in January, 2017, replaced by Jeremy Rabe in May, 2018. Former president and chief strategy officer Nathaniel Felsher left in November, less than three months after he took the job.

Aimia’s other assets include a 48-per-cent stake in Aeromexico’s loyalty program, PLM, and a 20-per-cent share of AirAsia’s loyalty program, Think Big.

Related topics

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies