Skip to main content

Canada’s central bank is poised to launch the most sweeping review in decades of its guiding 2-per-cent inflation target, an acknowledgment of possible flaws in its inflation-fighting mantra.

The decade-long aftermath of the financial crisis has exposed potential problems in the Bank of Canada’s ability to do its job, senior deputy governor Carolyn Wilkins said Tuesday.

The central bank is doing a deep dive into numerous alternatives to the 2-per-cent inflation target – some of which could mean tolerating higher inflation – as it prepares for the 2021 expiry of its monetary policy agreement with the federal government, Ms. Wilkins said.

Story continues below advertisement

“There is no doubt that our inflation-targeting framework has promoted the economic and financial well-being of Canadians,” she told an audience at McGill University in Montreal. “A decade of experience in the post-crisis world, though, shows us it is not perfect.”

The bank reviews its mandate every five years. But it’s now planning a more comprehensive analysis than it’s done in decades of the various alternatives to its 2-per-cent target, which has been in place since 1995. Changes that result from the review, if any, are likely to be in place by the second half of 2021.

“Normally, we take one alternative at a time,” Ms. Wilkins explained. “Being transparent and doing a side-by-side assessment will set a really good foundation for whatever we end up deciding.”

The bank is exploring a number of variants, including temporarily setting a higher inflation target in times of economic stress, shifting to a longer-range inflation target, or tracking economic growth rather than inflation. The bank is also looking at a dual mandate – namely, targeting inflation as well as GDP growth or employment. The U.S. Federal Reserve, for example, targets both inflation and maximum employment.

The central bank uses its key short-term interest rate to try to keep inflation near 2 per cent, or the midpoint of a 1- to 3-per-cent target range. Inflation has run slightly above 2 per cent through much of this year as economic growth picked up. (Lower interest rates encourage individuals and companies to borrow more, driving up demand and prices. Higher rates do the opposite.)

One of the effects of the 2008-09 financial crisis is that the so-called neutral interest rate has been drifting lower. That is the level where rates neither slow down nor speed up economic activity. A lower level means the bank will have less room to cut rates to stimulate the economy when the next recession hits.

“The central bank is more likely to run out of conventional firepower in the event of an economic downturn,” Ms. Wilkins warned.

Story continues below advertisement

The bank’s overnight rate is now set at 1.75 per cent. The rate was at 4.25 per cent in early 2008 – just before the financial crisis erupted – giving the central bank ample room to cut as the economy weakened.

The other challenge of a lower neutral rate is that it has encouraged Canadians to take on too much risky debt, leaving the economy “exposed to boom-bust financial cycles,” Ms. Wilkins said.

The bank has other tools it can use, including negative interest rates – which would penalize financial institutions for parking their cash at the central bank by charging them interest – and purchases of assets, such as mortgages.

Ms. Wilkins also acknowledged that monetary policy can’t be the “only game in town.” She said government spending and tax policies are also important tools. And Ms. Wilkins gave a nod to tighter lending rules, which have been used effectively in Canada in recent years to keep a lid on risky household borrowing.

Ms. Wilkins said the central bank will develop a side-by-side comparison of the most promising alternatives to the 2-per-cent inflation target “to see if any are better.”

The objective is to figure out clear objectives for monetary policy, “and assess how it affects people,” she said.

Story continues below advertisement

The Bank of Canada’s next scheduled rate decision is Dec. 5.​

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies