Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Three major investment associations have banded together to push the industry for a quick merger between two self-regulatory organizations, or SROs, that oversee Canada’s investment community.

Currently, the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada, or IIROC, supervises securities dealers, while the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada, or MFDA, handles 90 mutual fund dealers. The two SROs have been criticized for overlapping areas of oversight as more wealth managers serve customers who buy both mutual funds and individual securities.

In a joint statement on Wednesday, the Investment Funds Institute of Canada, the Investment Industry Association of Canada and the Federation of Mutual Fund Dealers submitted recommendations to regulators to “leverage” the best assets of both SROs to the “fullest extent,” rather than build a new organization from the ground up.

Story continues below advertisement

“It will be important for the SRO consolidation process to proceed as quickly as possible to safeguard the ongoing stability of the Canadian capital markets,” said Richard Rousseau, co-chair of the forum and vice-chair of Raymond James Ltd.’s private client group in Quebec.

The three associations – known jointly as the Investment Industry SRO Forum – began working on the recommendations in January. The forum includes board members from each organization.

In late 2019, the Canadian Securities Administrators, or CSA, an umbrella organization of Canada’s provincial and territorial securities commissions, announced it was reviewing the “regulatory framework” that governs both the IIROC and the MFDA. The results of the CSA review are expected to be released in June, but the review sparked both SROs to publish conflicting proposals on how to join forces.

The MFDA proposed an 18-month plan that would build a new entity from scratch and include the regulation of exempt market dealers, scholarship plan dealers and portfolio managers, which are currently handled by provincial securities commissions.

Under IIROC’s plan, the two regulators could merge in just three months by continuing to perform the same functions with little change in their regulatory design – but reduce overlap and regulatory costs for wealth managers.

Now, the forum has published 32 recommendations on how the CSA could begin to merge the two entities quickly, including suggestions around governance, policy and operating efficiencies.

Forum co-chair Carol Lynde, who is also the chief executive officer of Bridgehouse Asset Managers, said the forum’s “overarching” objective in developing these recommendations is “to improve the investor experience and strengthen investor protection.”

Story continues below advertisement

The recommendations focus on investor access to advice and financial products and services, stronger investor protection, better governance, improved operating efficiencies through streamlined regulation and reduced regulatory barriers, and more effective rule-making and compliance oversight.

For example, the SRO board of directors should include members with knowledge and experience of consumer issues, as well as incorporate advice from an investor advisory panel.

Other suggestions include a new rule-approval process that ensures oversight, but allows for a “swift response to emerging risks,” and the SRO should no longer permit rule-making by guidance notices as it does not include stakeholder consultation, as well as CSA oversight of the rule development.

Rules should be harmonized where appropriate, including “know-your-client” requirements, outside business activities, continuing education and suitability.

“IIROC and MFDA rules are already highly harmonized … however, there are a number of areas where SRO rules that address the same risks are different without any principled reason why they should be different,” the report said.

A more “disciplined approach” to rule-making will help control the future cost of regulation, the forum said. Using cost-benefit and impact analysis for significant rule proposals and publishing plain-language rules will also help the way rules are interpreted and applied by the SRO.

Story continues below advertisement

The new SRO should also streamline accounts for investors to more easily access multiple investments, it said.

Currently, the two SROs require separate client accounts because of different compliance oversight requirements for each account type.

“The new SRO should invest in technology that will support multiple views of client account ranges: a regulatory view to support all necessary account supervision requirements and a client view that would provide the client with ‘one touch’ access to their accounts,” the forum said.

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies