Skip to main content

Ontario's Finance Minister Vic Fedeli arrives for a meeting with Ontario Premier Doug Ford and members of cabinet in Toronto, Aug. 30, 2018.

Chris Young/The Canadian Press

Ontario’s decision to interfere in a national review of mutual fund fees has thrown the six-year study into disarray, raising questions about the prospects for change, including the elimination of early-withdrawal fees.

On Thursday, the Canadian Securities Administrators, an umbrella group for all provincial securities watchdogs, proposed changes that would prohibit the fees, known as deferred sales charges (DSCs), on mutual funds. The review included public consultations and research papers, and the provincial regulators supported the recommendations.

Shortly after the proposals were formally announced, Ontario Finance Minister Vic Fedeli released a statement opposing the recommendations. In doing so, the province has stalled the planned reforms, raising the possibility that no changes will take place. That would mean some customers will continue to be subject to the fees, of which they are often unaware.

Story continues below advertisement

The watchdogs say their public comment period for the proposals will remain open for the next 90 days. “As with all CSA consultations, [regulators] will carefully consider all feedback and comment letters received,” the group said in a statement. However, the OSC is the largest of the provincial regulators, and has acknowledged it must adhere to the desires of the provincial government – leading analysts and advisers to believe the fees will continue.

Calling Ontario’s opposition an “unexpected development,” CIBC World Markets analyst Paul Holden noted the provincial finance ministry has final approval on regulatory proposals from the OSC. “Our assumption then is that DSC is here to stay,” he wrote in a research report.

Based on this assumption, financial advisers and money managers concerned about investor costs expressed dismay at the government’s sudden intrusion. Because of the early-withdrawal fees, investors often find themselves unable to access their own money for years.

“The zeitgeist right now is a move towards transparency and flexibility," said David O’Leary, founder of Kind Wealth. By contrast, the Ontario government wants to fight a ban on what is widely viewed as an archaic fee structure at a time when wealth management giants such as Fidelity are introducing no-fee funds.

“They’re going to be on the wrong side of history,” he added.

DSCs force clients to pay as much as 6 per cent to cash out their mutual funds, a fee that tends to fall by 1 per cent each year, down to 0 per cent after holding for five to seven years. While 18 per cent of all mutual fund assets – about $300-billion – in Canada carried the DSC option at the end of 2016, DSCs are used on only 1 per cent of mutual fund assets in the United States and Europe, the CSA says.

Historically, DSCs were thought to benefit lower-income investors, because they allowed them to buy mutual funds without paying upfront. (Mutual funds used to cost as much as 9 per cent to buy in.) Investment advisers also liked DSCs because they would receive a 5-per-cent commission from the mutual-fund manufacturers for selling funds with these fees to their clients, giving them a reason to take on lower-income clients.

Story continues below advertisement

At the same time, the penalty for selling a fund within seven years of purchase forced buyers who were aware of the fees to hold onto the investments, something thought to encourage investing discipline during market hiccups.

Although other Western countries have largely abandoned DSCs, some Canadian mutual fund and adviser lobby groups supported Ontario’s opposition to the ban. “The DSC is a good payment option for some investors who would not otherwise have access to financial advice," Paul Bourque, president of the Investment Funds Institute of Canada, said in a statement.

Over the years, however, regulators found an increasing number of investors were incorrectly sold DSC funds – specifically retirees who do not have long-term investment horizons.

Mr. Fedeli did not respond to a request for comment.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter