Skip to main content

Volatile financial markets sapped the strength from an otherwise solid first quarter at National Bank of Canada.

Profit and revenue for the country’s sixth-largest bank were effectively flat compared with a year ago, as a 17-per-cent decline in profit from the financial-markets arm offset gains in all other key divisions.

National Bank is the fourth of Canada’s Big Six banks to report fiscal first-quarter results this earnings season, and each has reported weaker results from capital markets, compared with the same period last year, after turbulence in financial markets at the end of 2018. But while National Bank missed analysts’ profit expectations, the underlying trends in several of its core businesses continue to look stable, and the bank hopes it will look back at the first quarter as a minor speed-bump.

Story continues below advertisement

“I think we’re hopeful that the [first-quarter] experience, especially in capital markets … was a one-off. It certainly appears to be that way," said Louis Vachon, chief executive officer of National Bank. “We’re hopeful that in the next few quarters, the revenue line will be better.”

National Bank’s financial markets division was its major weak spot, as profit fell to $170-million from $204-million a year ago. The decline was consistent with the troubles encountered by other large banks’ capital-markets arms after choppy market conditions through much of November and December. As companies took a pause, National Bank’s corporate and investment banking revenue fell 12 per cent, compounded by lower gains on investments.

But investment banking results tend to vary more than retail banking or wealth management, and are being treated more as an anomaly than a trend. “We tend not to get too excited when earnings exceed expectations owing to strength in market-sensitive revenues and so are disinclined to fuss too much about volatility-induced weakness this time around,” Robert Sedran, an analyst at CIBC World Markets Inc., said in a research note.

For the quarter that ended Jan. 31, National Bank reported a profit of $552-million, or $1.50 a share, compared with $550-million, or $1.46 a year ago.

Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S were expecting share earnings of $1.54.

The bank also held its quarterly dividend steady at 65 cents a share.

Profit from personal and commercial banking increased 7 per cent to $246-million, as mortgages helped drive personal lending 5 per cent higher, and commercial loans increased by 10 per cent. Mortgage loans increased 5 per cent, driven by a healthy real estate market in Quebec, where the bank issues more than half of its home loans. After a recent decision to pull back from the use of third-party mortgage brokers, National Bank has begun soliciting mortgages in Quebec through a new partnership with brokerage M3.

Story continues below advertisement

“We’re nuancing the policy,” Mr. Vachon said, noting that the bank still doesn’t plan to use third-party brokers outside Quebec. “It’s a targeted market with a much better track record."

In wealth management, profit rose 10 per cent to $125-million thanks to growing deposit volumes and better margins on those deposits. And the U.S. specialty finance and international division increased its earnings 20 per cent to $60-million, largely owing to better performance by the bank’s ABA Bank subsidiary in Cambodia.

National Bank’s credit quality was virtually unchanged year-over-year, with provisions for credit losses – the funds banks set aside to cover loans that may go bad – edging $1-million higher to $88-million. While provisions for performing commercial loans and financial markets loans were higher, that was offset by lower expected losses on personal loans and at the bank’s Credigy Ltd. subsidiary.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies