Skip to main content

Sluggish sales at Nordstrom Inc. underscore why members of the founding family wanted to take the company private in the first place.

With unseasonable temperatures crimping demand for apparel in the first quarter, comparable sales missed analysts’ estimates. The closely watched measure rose 0.6 percent, the department store chain said Thursday. Analysts were expecting an increase of 1 percent, according to Consensus Metrix.

The results sent shares down in late trading and added to the industry’s mixed bag this earnings season. Macy’s Inc. cited strong consumer demand, but J.C. Penney underwhelmed investors with sales that missed expectations.

Story continues below advertisement

Nordstrom has sought to drive sales at its value-focused Rack chain as a way to insulate the merchandise at its full-price stores from discounts, but the results may cause investors to question that approach. The Seattle-based retailer is also trying new strategies, such as an inventory-free store, after the board ended talks in March with the Nordstrom family to take the company private.

The shares dropped as much as 7.7 percent to $47 in late trading in New York. The stock had gained 7.5 percent this year through Thursday’s close.

Nordstrom posted sales of $3.56 billion in the first quarter, which ended May 5. That topped the $3.45 billion analysts predicted. Profit in the period was 51 cents a share, excluding some items, more than the 44 cents analysts called for.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.