Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Ottawa will re-examine a major expansion planned for the Vista coal mine in Alberta, saying Thursday a federal environmental assessment is necessary given how much the project would increase the site’s size and production.

The existing Vista coal mine is nestled in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains, near the town of Hinton. Federal Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson told The Globe and Mail the expansion project would have “significant” environmental effects that fall under federal jurisdiction, thus triggering the need for an assessment.

Mr. Wilkinson had originally decided last December to keep the federal government out of the approvals process for the mine’s expansion. But he said Thursday he was worried that Vista lodged two separate expansion applications for what he says amounts to a single project.

Story continues below advertisement

“That would lead me to be concerned that this is, perhaps, an exercise in project-splitting for the purpose of avoiding a federal assessment,” he said.

The Vista mine, owned by the U.S. coal giant Cline Group, is operated by Coalspur Mines Ltd. It began shipping coal for export in May, 2019, and is looking to double – or possibly even triple – its output. It currently produces about six million tonnes a year of thermal coal (which is burned to generate electricity), that it exports to mostly Asian markets. The expansion would increase output to between 13 million and 15 million tonnes.

Coalspur did not respond to a request from The Globe for comment.

Also on Thursday, Mr. Wilkinson released the terms of reference for the federal government’s strategic assessment of all mining of thermal coal in Canada. The review will consider the health and economic effects in the context of Canada’s international commitments to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

It will also take into account the country’s membership of the Powering Past Coal Alliance – an international group jointly launched in 2017 by Britain and Canada, which aims to convince the world’s wealthiest countries to eliminate coal as a source of electricity by 2030 and the rest of the world by 2050.

“I think Canadians expect us to look at whether or not we should continue to be exporting thermal coal at a time when we’re telling other governments that they shouldn’t be using it,” Mr. Wilkinson told The Globe Thursday.

The results of that assessment will not play into the Vista mine review, which will only be subject to guidelines from the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC), the federal agency that reviews all major resource projects.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Wilkinson said the second application – lodged just a couple of months ago – led him to change his mind about a federal assessment.

“When we saw the second project come forward, we looked at the two – as we should in the context of the overall increase in the production of coal and the environmental impact – and made the determination that we really should be thinking about the two as a single project,” he said.

Together, the expansions would increase coal production by 20,000 tonnes a day, and increase the mine’s size by 49.7 per cent, he said. The limits that would have automatically triggered a federal assessment are 5,000 tonnes and 50 per cent.

When combined with requests from the Louis Bull Tribe and the Stoney Nakoda Nation for a review, and concerns from the public and several environmental groups, Mr. Wilkinson said it was clear the project needed a second look.

The IAAC will now work with the Alberta government and provincial regulator to align their reviews of the project, he said, which will take about a year. The Alberta government did not return requests for comment.

Jess Sinclair, press secretary to Alberta Environment Minister Jason Nixon, said in an email Thursday evening the United Conservative government was “disappointed” that Ottawa would intercede in the Vista mine project approval.”

Story continues below advertisement

“As Section 92A of the Canadian Constitution guarantees Alberta the right to jurisdiction over our own resource development, we will be studying the issue over the coming days and taking all appropriate action,” Ms. Sinclair said.

Mr. Wilkinson rejected the notion that stepping in with a review would send a negative signal to investors, saying if anything it would provide market certainty by ensuring the integrity of regulatory processes.

The move to designate Vista for a federal environmental assessment comes after a group of 47 environmental, Indigenous, health and faith-based organizations wrote to the minister earlier this month, urging him to reconsider his December decision.

Among those signatories was Ecojustice. Alan Andrews, a lawyer with the group and its climate program director, said Thursday he was “absolutely delighted” that Ottawa will launch a review.

“If [Mr. Wilkinson] had allowed this to go through, it would have made a mockery of the new impact assessment regime and would have sent a really dangerous signal to project proponents that they can get away with this kind of skullduggery of splitting big projects down into smaller, bite-sized pieces just to avoid the regulatory impact assessment,” Mr. Andrews told The Globe.

Mr. Andrews is also pleased Ottawa is launching a broader strategic review of thermal coal, saying Canada needs to undertake a full assessment of where the fuel fits within its climate commitments.

Story continues below advertisement

“Canada can’t claim on the world stage to be leading on climate, it can’t claim to be powering past coal, while it’s prepared to continue selling this stuff on world markets,” he said.

- With a report from The Canadian Press

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies