Skip to main content

Pedro Parente, President of Brazil's state-run oil company Petroleo Brasileiro SA, attends a news conference in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil May 8, 2018.

SERGIO MORAES/Reuters

Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.’s chief executive quit on Friday in a surprise move that wiped $12- billion off the state-controlled oil producer’s market valuation, after Brazil’s government responded to a national trucking strike by intervening in the company’s fuel pricing policy.

Pedro Parente, who in two years in the job had succeeded in slashing the scandal-plagued company’s debt and restoring it to profitability, said in a resignation letter to President Michel Temer it was clear after the last week’s turmoil that new talks would be needed on pricing policy.

“Given this situation, it has become clear that my remaining as CEO of Petrobras has stopped being positive and will not contribute to the alternatives that the government must consider going forward,” Mr. Parente said in the letter.

Story continues below advertisement

His resignation appeared to have taken Mr. Temer’s already beleaguered government by surprise. A senior presidential source told Reuters on Thursday no such move was expected.

Petrobras said in a statement the board would choose an interim CEO on Friday and other top executives would remain. A company source said the board would meet at 4 p.m. (1900 GMT).

Mr. Parente urged Mr. Temer to adhere to the company’s corporate governance rules in naming a successor, which would bar any political appointees for the post.

Petrobras shares were down 13 per cent in early afternoon trading, pulling Brazil’s wider Bovespa index into negative territory. The real currency weakened as much as 1 per cent against the dollar.

The drop in Petrobras shares wiped some 45-billion reais ($12-billion) from the company’s capitalization, according to Reuters’ calculations.

Petrobras, one of the most widely held emerging market stocks, was at the epicentre of a bribery and graft scandal involving some of its key suppliers that began to roil Brazil’s political and business worlds four years ago.

Brazil’s former left-wing government also used the company to subsidize fuel prices, helping drive it heavily into debt.

Story continues below advertisement

TRUCK DRIVERS STRIKE

A key plank of Mr. Parente’s turnaround campaign for the company and a condition for his taking the top job in 2016 was freedom to control fuel prices. He sought to align those more closely with international markets through nearly daily price adjustments.

But on Sunday Mr. Temer, governing with rock-bottom approval ratings, announced plans to placate the striking truck drivers – who were protesting the high cost of diesel – by freezing fuel prices on a monthly basis and taking other measures to bring domestic diesel prices down.

Truckers have gradually returned to work since then after a protest that left gas stations and some airports without fuel and supermarket shelves bare. The government on Friday threatened to prosecute those calling for a new strike.

“The policy [Mr. Parente] put in place was the scapegoat of this whole crisis,” said Roberto Castello Branco, a former Petrobras board member, arguing that Mr. Temer’s weakened government must have asked Mr. Parente for changes he could not accept. “The pressure on him was enormous.”

“For the country, for the company, a great source of uncertainty has opened that is very dangerous,” he added.

Story continues below advertisement

Although Mr. Temer promised the government would compensate Petrobras for any losses incurred by its intervention on fuel prices, the move may have crossed Mr. Parente’s red line against political interference.

Mr. Parente had said he would not quit during the crisis. But rumours swirled about a possible exit after Mr. Parente, a turnaround expert, was named chairman of troubled poultry company BRF in April.

BRF shares soared 8 per cent after Mr. Parente’s resignation was announced.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter