Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

A D-Wave 2X quantum computer is pictured during a media tour of the Quantum Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (QuAIL) at NASA Ames Research Center in Mountain View, Calif., on Dec. 8, 2015.

Stephen Lam/Reuters

D-Wave Systems Inc. became an early leader in the race to develop the world’s most powerful processor by taking a different approach than rival developers of technology called quantum computers. That allowed D-Wave to get to market faster – but limited what problems its machines could solve.

Now, after a challenging stretch, the pioneering Burnaby, B.C., company says it will follow the lead of IBM, Google and others and develop an all-purpose quantum computer using a “gate-model” design similar to those its rivals are pursuing. However, the company said it will still continue advancing its own more specialized approach, dubbed “quantum annealing.” It was this technology which allowed the company to claim to have put the first quantum computer on the market years ago.

“We’ve taken what we’ve learned and built over the past 20 years and developed a quantum platform road map that will further the benefits of annealing quantum computing … while accelerating our ability to expand into other problem classes,” chief executive officer Alan Baratz said in a release.

Story continues below advertisement

He told Fortune D-Wave is still “absolutely committed” to developing annealing systems. “But there are important questions that annealing cannot address” in areas such as physics and chemistry equations. “So if we could also bring a gate-model system, we would be the only company in the world” with both.

The move came as a surprise to the industry, Daniel Lidar, director of the Center for Quantum Information Science & Technology at University of Southern California, said in an interview. “I don’t think this is admitting defeat,” Dr. Lidar said of the company’s decision to move to develop gate-model computers. “What I think they’re doing is clever. Their strategy was to scale up as quickly as possible using the focus on annealing … Now I expect with the appropriate modifications they’ll take that know-how and put it to work in gate-model devices. It’s a natural next step.”

D-Wave was cofounded in 1999 by Geordie Rose shortly after he earned his PhD in theoretical physics from the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. Scientists had theorized for years that quantum processors could solve vastly more complex problems than the world’s most powerful computers. But they figured they would take decades to develop. IBM was already trying.

In 2004, Mr. Rose broke from conventional thinking, concluding the approach most were pursuing would be impossible to build effectively. Instead, he embraced emerging theories and set out to make an annealing device.

Classic computer systems are made of bits, or tiny circuits on a microchip that are either open or closed – representing ones and zeros in conventional software.

In a gate-model quantum computer, bits are replaced with entities called qubits. Each qubit holds a value that can simultaneously behave as though it is a one and a zero owing to the weird properties of matter at small scales. If many such qubits are linked together – a huge technical challenge – they can zip through calculations of a sort that would tie up a conventional computer for trillions of years. A gate-model machine that can be made to work at a practical scale would have many potential applications.

In contrast, D-Wave’s annealing system uses qubits that start off with a similar mixed identity, then quickly settle into one pattern or another. D-Wave’s proposition was that it could use this transition to solve a more limited class of “optimization” problems – problems which call for identifying the best solution from a vast number of possibilities.

Story continues below advertisement

To build such a machine, D-Wave had to generate temperatures colder than those in deep space inside the machine, to slow the atoms inside D-Wave’s processors and harness their quantum effects. Mr. Rose called it “the hardest engineering project that has ever been attempted in the history of man.”

Mr. Rose, who left the company in 2014, was greeted with skepticism by many in the scientific community. But D-Wave built progressively better and faster versions of its machine, raised US$300-million from the likes of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency’s venture-capital arm and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos. It sold models to Google, Lockheed Martin, NASA and the Los Alamos National Laboratory in the United States.

D-Wave CEO Vern Brownell hired Mr. Baratz in 2017 to build software systems that worked with its hardware. Mr. Baratz had led Sun Microsystems Inc.’s effort in the 1990s to transform Java from a nascent programming language into the internet’s main software-writing program.

Mr. Baratz led a shift in D-Wave’s strategy, which accelerated after he replaced Mr. Brownell as CEO in early 2020. D-Wave focused on providing online access to its technology and stopped selling its expensive shed-sized machines. Online customers included Volkswagen and biotechnology startups that used D-Wave to solve complex optimization problems such as improving traffic flows and identifying proteins that could become drugs.

D-Wave also completed a costly US$40-million refinancing last year that wiped out most of the value of some long-time investors and cut its valuation to less than US$170-million from US$450-million. This past March, the Government of Canada committed $40-million to support D-Wave’s research and development costs.

The company must still spend years and tens of millions more to develop not only its annealing technology but now the gate-model machines. D-Wave also faces a new wave of rivals, including Toronto’s Xanadu Quantum Technologies Inc., which use different, less costly approaches to develop quantum computers.

Story continues below advertisement

With a file from Ivan Semeniuk

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies