Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Securities regulators are asking whether Canada needs more rules for “activist” short-sellers, even as they note Canadian companies are far less often targeted by them than companies in the United States.

The data is part of a consultation paper published Thursday by the Canadian Securities Administrators, the umbrella group of provincial regulators. The CSA is seeking comment on activist short-selling, noting Canadian companies and their advocates have been raising concerns about their impact on the markets.

The CSA also cited the large number of 2018 campaigns among the reasons for creating the consultation paper. The group noted a 2019 Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision that said “There is a perception that the regulation of shorting ... selling is permissive and lax in Canada compared to other capital markets.”

Story continues below advertisement

Short-sellers borrow stock, sell it and hope to profit by buying it back at a lower price before repaying the loan. Activist shareholders do it noisily, publicly making their case the stock is overvalued and sometimes alleging nefarious behavior. Companies targeted by activists often call the practice “short and distort.”

Canada saw a number of short campaigns in the early years of the emerging cannabis sector, but other companies, such as Canadian Tire Ltd., Manulife Financial Corp. and Dollarama Inc., have also found themselves in the short-sellers’ sights.

While there was a large jump in activist short-selling in 2018, the CSA report says activist campaigns fell by two-thirds in 2019 suggesting the activity is “highly cyclical.” The CSA says between January, 2010, and September, 2020, a total of 73 Canadian companies have been the target of 116 campaigns - no more than five Canadian targets for every 1,000 Canadian-listed stocks. In comparison, the CSA says, there have been an average of 21 U.S. activist short-seller targets annually for every 1,000 U.S.-listed issuers. That rate is four times as high.

The 2018 total of 17 Canadian targets included six cannabis companies - suggesting, the CSA says, short-sellers focused on “specific, potentially overheated, sectors.”

The CSA says that in most of its jurisdictions, there is no mechanism under securities law that explicitly regulates the activities of activist short-sellers or their public statements. However, it says the conduct and statements of an activist short-seller could “fall offside of securities legislation” if they make materially misleading or untrue statements to the market. Still, the CSA says to make such a finding, the threshold of evidence is high. And civil lawsuits have not been widely used by companies to seek redress, either.

The CSA is asking for feedback on its consultation paper by March 3.

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies