Skip to main content

A proxy advisory firm is telling shareholders to stick with Detour Gold Corp.'s proposed slate of directors – a setback for Paulson & Co.'s efforts to overhaul the gold miner’s board.

In a report published late Friday, independent firm Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) advised investors to go with Detour’s board recommendations, despite Paulson’s agitating for wholesale change at Toronto-based Detour. Paulson, a New York hedge fund, has been pushing for an alternative board slate and the immediate removal of interim chief executive officer Michael Kenyon.

Paulson’s proxy push came in the summer, a few months after shares in Detour lost 30 per cent in a single session when it announced the expansion of its Detour Lake gold mine in Northern Ontario would cost a lot more than than expected.

Story continues below advertisement

Paulson urged Detour to sell itself after years of underperformance. The hedge fund also accused Detour of having an entrenched board that was intent on looking out for its own interests, and not those of shareholders.

ISS wrote that while Paulson had highlighted “legitimate concerns” around management turnover, operational performance and shareholder returns at Detour, the hedge fund had “failed to make a compelling case for board control” and “failed to articulate a detailed go-forward plan."

Proxy advisory firms are influential in these votes since many institutional shareholders rely on their recommendations.

Detour has said it is focusing on improving operations at its struggling Detour Lake mine. It also agreed to make a number of board changes, some of which were recommended by Paulson.

Benôit Gervais, portfolio manager with MacKenzie Financial, which holds a 3.5-per-cent stake in Detour, says the firm will be voting for a mix of board candidates, some recommended by Detour, and others by Paulson.

He was critical that Detour took so long to make changes to its board, and only after after it was forced to take action by Paulson.

He applauded Paulson for pushing for change at Detour after years of concerns from long-term shareholders over matters such as excessive pay packages. Mackenzie for example has repeatedly voted against the nomination of director Lisa Colnett, chair of the firm’s compensation committee.

Story continues below advertisement

Yet Mr. Gervais stopped short of backing Paulson entirely, saying the hedge fund’s thesis that “nothing was right” at Detour wasn’t entirely accurate either.

“The truth is somewhere in between,” he said.

One major Detour shareholder, Tocqueville Asset Management, has agreed to vote for Detour’s slate, according to a source familiar with the matter. Tocqueville, based in New York, holds a 4.4-per-cent stake in Detour, making it the third biggest shareholder after Van Eck Associates Corp. and Paulson, which hold 12.5 and 5.7 per cent, respectively.

Tocqueville did not respond to a request for comment on Monday.

Other Detour Gold investors, including Coast Capital Management and Livermore Partners, have also called for a Detour board overhaul.

A special meeting of Detour’s shareholders is scheduled for Dec. 11 when results of the proxy contest will be made public.

Story continues below advertisement

Glass Lewis, the other major independent proxy firm that will weigh in on the Detour fight, hasn’t yet released its recommendation for board nominees.

Editor’s note: A previous version of this story incorrectly said Coast Capital and LIvermore Partners sided with Detour.
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter