Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

The takeover battle for Hudson’s Bay Co. is set to heat up ahead of a key regulatory hearing this week, after an influential proxy adviser urged investors to reject a $1.1-billion offer led by the retailer’s executive chairman, Richard Baker.

Institutional Shareholder Services Inc., which advises big stockholders on how to vote in corporate elections, late Friday recommended a “no” vote on the Baker group’s offer of $10.30 a share for HBC. ISS cited "significant defects” in HBC’s sale process that prevented investors from getting a higher bid.

Catalyst Capital Group Inc., the Toronto private equity fund led by financier Newton Glassman, has made an alternative proposal, saying it is willing to pay $11 per share for the company.

Story continues below advertisement

A shareholder vote on the offer by the Baker group, which owns 57 per cent of HBC’s stock, is set for Dec. 17. A special committee of the board of directors has recommended the Baker bid, which must be approved by a majority of the other shareholders.

The two sides in the takeover battle are scheduled to go head to head at the Ontario Securities Commission beginning Wednesday, with Catalyst seeking to have the Baker group’s offer blocked, or the shareholder vote postponed. Hearings are scheduled for Wednesday through Friday, but the agenda could change.

The main problem with the Baker group offer, ISS said, is that the special committee of HBC directors negated the potential for superior offers when it ruled that no competing bid – even a higher one – could be successful as long as Mr. Baker’s group refused to sell.

“It appears that the special committee handcuffed itself by recommending an agreement that defines a superior proposal as something that could never happen,” said ISS. The special committee has urged shareholders to accept the Baker group offer and rejected Catalyst’s proposal last week, saying it had no reasonable chance of being consummated because the majority shareholders would not sell.

Catalyst owns a third of the shares not owned by the Baker group, and it has at least a few allies: Late last week, Ortelius Advisors LP, a New York-based hedge fund that owns 0.5 per cent of HBC, sued the company and Mr. Baker’s group, seeking an injunction against the deal.

In a statement Saturday, Gabriel de Alba, managing director of Catalyst, said, “ISS has clearly called out the HBC board and the insider group, led by executive chairman Richard Baker, for their egregious pattern of conflicts, misrepresentations and self-serving game … this process was designed to transfer value from minority shareholders to Richard Baker and his selected insiders.”

The Baker group did not respond to the ISS report or to the Catalyst comments by Sunday afternoon. HBC investors also expect a recommendation from rival proxy advisory firm Glass, Lewis & Co. sometime this week.

Story continues below advertisement

Late Friday, after ISS published its report, the special committee released additional background information to the transaction. In a statement, it said that when Mr. Baker worked to assemble his buyout group, he operated with the permission of the committee, which believed a potential offer that cashed out minority shareholders could be in their best interest, given the company’s “declining stock price and [its] ongoing challenges and risks.”

Amid all this, the company is slated to release results Tuesday. Analysts expect it to post a substantial loss.

If the news is worse than expected it could help Mr. Baker’s case, as his argument is that the company is struggling, expected to post considerable losses in the near term, and would best recover if it weren’t in the glare of the public markets, releasing potentially disappointing numbers every quarter.

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Follow related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies