Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

Shareholders of Shaw Communications Inc. have voted in favour of the $20.4-billion takeover offer from Rogers Communications Inc. , though the deal still has a number of regulatory hurdles to overcome.

The vast majority – 99.8 per cent – of the votes cast at a special meeting of Shaw’s shareholders on Thursday were in favour of the merger, Shaw said in a news release.

The acquisition, which was announced in March, is expected to come under regulatory scrutiny as it would reduce the number of wireless competitors to three from four in Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia, where Shaw’s wireless business Freedom Mobile operates.

Story continues below advertisement

Rogers has submitted applications to the Competition Bureau, the Ministry of Innovation, Science and Economic Development (ISED), and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) – the three regulatory bodies that need to greenlight the purchase. Rogers and Shaw expect the deal to close in the first half of next year.

Many analysts have predicted that Rogers will have to sell off some wireless assets to win approval from the Competition Bureau. The bureau will weigh in on whether the merger is likely to result in a lessening of competition, while transfers of spectrum – licences to the airwaves used to the transmit wireless signals – will need approval from ISED. The CRTC will focus on the potential transfer of Shaw’s broadcasting assets to Rogers.

Ottawa to triple spectrum for WiFi use

The time is now to renew and reinforce Ottawa’s four-player wireless policy

Desjardins analyst Jerome Dubreuil said that Thursday’s vote was not seen as a major obstacle given the large premium being offered to Shaw’s shareholders and the fact that there has not been much pushback from the Western Canadian telecom’s largest investors.

“We believe regulatory approval generates the most concern among investors and is likely why [Shaw] does not trade at a higher price,” Mr. Dubreuil said in a note to clients. Shaw’s class-B shares closed up 1.1 per cent to $36.03 on the Toronto Stock Exchange Thursday, below the $40.50-a-share offer from Rogers.

Mr. Dubreuil said he estimates there is a 90-per-cent chance that the deal will be approved. Rogers is likely most interested in Shaw’s cable network, which has virtually no overlap with its own cable assets, Mr. Dubreuil said. In addition, Canadian regulators have typically been flexible in finding ways to make deals work from a competition perspective, he added.

Chief executive Brad Shaw called the vote an important milestone toward the combination of the two companies. “Shaw’s shareholders overwhelmingly supported the transaction and the high voter turnout, which exceeded 70 per cent, represents a strong endorsement for the combination,” Mr. Shaw said in a statement.

Joe Natale, president and CEO of Rogers, thanked shareholders for supporting the deal. “Rogers and Shaw are coming together to build a world-class national network and create new jobs and investment in Western Canada,” Mr. Natale said in a statement.

Story continues below advertisement

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies