Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Briefing highlights

  • What’s at stake for Canadian dollar
  • Loonie above 77 cents
  • A NAFTA comment I’d love to hear
  • What analysts say about NAFTA
  • Markets at a glance
  • Scotiabank raises dividend, profit dips
  • BMO profit rises in quarter

A ‘weaker hand’

The Canada dollar has a lot riding on NAFTA as Ottawa returns to the bargaining table in a “near-take-it-or-leave-it” squeeze.

Like the peso, the loonie jumped Monday as the U.S. and Mexico struck a deal, putting the heat on Ottawa, particularly given President Donald Trump’s renewed threats to hit Canada with tariffs on auto imports should there be no resolution on the North American free-trade agreement.

As The Globe and Mail’s Adrian Morrow and Robert Fife report, Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland will be back at the table in Washington today.

Story continues below advertisement

“Canada now appears to be in a near-take-it-or-leave-it situation with respect to spinning the U.S.-Mexico deal into a broader agreement on a revamped NAFTA,” said Bank of Montreal senior economist Robert Kavcic.

“Should the circumstances dictate that they ‘leave it,’ (Mexico is still openly hoping for Canadian participation), a possible 25-per-cent tariff on auto production looms, as threatened again by President Trump,” he added in a report.

“But, the fact that a number of Republicans in Congress have expressed the need to keep Canada in any deal could be a chip in Canada’s favour. Indeed, should the U.S. and Mexico be relegated to a bilateral deal, the ability to push it into law is unclear, and likely won’t be nearly as swift.”

Bipan Rai, North America head of foreign exchange strategy at CIBC World Markets, agreed Ms. Freeland is returning to talks with “a weaker hand.”

Canada is still at risk of being “left out in the cold,” Mr. Rai said, which would, of course, ding the loonie.

“That risk increases substantially if the Trudeau government digs in and decides that the new agreement does not suit them,” he said, adding that Ottawa will have to give in on some issues to get a deal.

“If Canada is left out – that’s CAD bearish. Full stop,” Mr. Rai said, referring to the loonie by its symbol.

Story continues below advertisement

“No deal implies that we’re looking at a scenario where auto tariffs from the U.S. come into play and domestic investment is likely to slow. At the very least, that pushes out Bank of Canada rate hikes to a degree.”

Having said that, CIBC, like others, believes a deal with Canada will be struck, even though no one knows what it could look like.

“The deal or no-deal play is what matters for Canada and the CAD this week,” Mr. Rai said.

“Markets are already pricing a deal, so the risk has become asymmetric towards a no-deal scenario. If you’re concerned about the CAD – keep that in mind and worry about the details later.”

Benjamin Reitzes, BMO’s Canadian rates and macro strategist, forecasts that the currency will “appreciate modestly” this year to just shy of 78.5 U.S. cents, and more in 2019 to the 80-mark should Ottawa join the U.S. and Mexico in a new agreement.

This comes, too, at an interesting time for the Bank of Canada, which meets next week and had been expected to hold its benchmark rate steady until October.

Story continues below advertisement

Governor Stephen Poloz and his central bank colleagues have oft cited the uncertainty surrounding NAFTA, but have also said they’re waiting for something concrete.

“Until there is a more definitive result on NAFTA, expect the status quo from the BoC on policy,” Mr. Reitzes said, and, thus, he still expects the central bank to hold the line next week.

“Note that even if Canada joins the agreement, it’s unclear the BoC will get more aggressive on policy, though it likely would ultimately mean that interest rates finish the cycle higher than if there is no NAFTA resolution,” he added.

A comment I’d love to hear

Tell me, have you ever heard the phrase ‘divide and conquer’?

Chrystia Freeland and Mexico's Secretary of Economy Ildefonso Guajardo Villarreal

What the analysts say

“Canada lacks leverage in the negotiations, owing to the asymmetries in the trading relationship between the U.S. and Canada. Trump’s threat of auto tariffs also raises the pressure on Canada to accept the terms of the deal on offer. Whether or not Canada agrees with the concept of a NAFTA reboot, we suspect it does little to benefit the loonie. An in-principal agreement is worth a knee-jerk in the headlines, though it is unlikely to offer much momentum beyond that. Indeed, we estimate zero to little risk premium priced into the currency, suggesting there is not much of a discount to price out.” Mark McCormick, TD Securities, in a report titled “Canada, you’re fired”

“The Canadian dollar is seeing a short squeeze of significant fashion as the bears cover – seemingly in anticipation of a successful resolution to NAFTA, or whatever its new acronym will be going forward.” David Rosenberg, Gluskin Sheff + Associates

“Canada may find it harder to sign up to US-Mexico understandings on other key U.S. demands - but the pressure for Canada to get on board quickly may also hand it more leverage … [The] announcement should substantially lighten market-pricing of NAFTA risk for all three countries, but a great deal of work remains to be done to conclude a new trilateral NAFTA 2.0. Nevertheless, [it] event provides the White House with a strong talking point ahead of the mid-term election: President Trump doesn’t need a signed and sealed new NAFTA to campaign on his ‘success’ in renegotiating the trade agreement.” Brett House, Derek Holt, Eduardo Suarez, Bank of Nova Scotia

Story continues below advertisement

“Depending on what the U.S. now asks of Canada, the Mexico-U.S. agreement on autos is a potentially positive development for Canada, since Mexico had been securing the lion’s share of recent new investments in the North American auto industry. However, we still openly wonder whether this is a net positive for Canada as things stand right now - it is not yet obvious that a deal agreeable to Ottawa can be reached, and the president’s tone [Mondy] was far from encouraging on that front. In other words, while we are cautiously optimistic, we would not change any Canadian forecasts until Canada is officially part of the deal - or isn’t, as the case may be.” Douglas Porter, BMO

“The trade deal needs to be approved by Congress, but investors are clearly confident of it getting approved. Trade tensions have been hanging over equity markets, and this is certainly a step in the right direction. It is believed that Canada will be on the agenda next, and traders will be paying close attention to those developments.” David Madden, CMC Markets

“Both sides hailed the agreement, and it provided some hope that at least one major link of the global trade chain might survive damage. Still, many obstacles remain, including whether Canada will accept the changes and join the revised pact, and how the White House will shepherd a bilateral agreement through Congress if Canada opts out.” Société Générale

“[Trump] wants to actually drop the name NAFTA and call it a bilateral U.S.-Mexico deal, with negotiations set to start immediately with Canada. That underscores our view that Canada is going to be presented with more of a take-it-or-leave-it offer, with the now not so subtle threat that the U.S. is prepared to leave Canada out and work on a bilateral basis with Mexico. For their part, the Mexicans are signalling their interest in staying with a trilateral pact involving Canada. We still think Canada and the U.S. will come to the table and get a deal done, but by saying Canada could be left out, the U.S. is threatening to take a tough line in those talks. Avery Shenfeld, CIBC

Read more

Markets at a glance

Read more

Scotiabank profit dips, BMO profit rises

Bank of Nova Scotia raised its dividend as it posted a dip in third-quarter profit, breaking from the pattern set by other major Canadian banks that have reported stronger results so far.

Profit slipped to $1.9-billion, or $1.55 a share, from $2.1-billion or $1.66 a year earlier.

Story continues below advertisement

On an adjusted basis, profit rose to $2.25-billion, or $1.76, from $2.12-billion or $1.68.

Return on equity came in at 13.1 per cent, compared to 14.8 per cent.

The bank raised its quarterly dividend by 3 cents to 85 cents.

BMO, meanwhile, posted a jump in profit, and to this point is the sole bank not to raise its dividend.

BMO profit rose in the third quarter to $1.54-billion, or $2.31 a share, with adjusted profit climbing to $1.57-billion or $2.36.

Return on equity was 14.7 per cent, compared to 13.4 per cent.

Story continues below advertisement

Read more
More news
Inside the Market
In case you missed it

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies