Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Briefing highlights

  • Housing market demons
  • CMHC passes its stress tests
  • Markets at a glance
  • LNG project gets go-ahead


The latest housing market reports read like Poltergeist II: Canada is still haunted despite the apparent ghost-busting success of policy makers.

Among the issues are affordability, still frothy prices and the housing-related debts Canadians are carrying.

The focus, as always, is on Vancouver and Toronto, where high prices and eroding affordability are demons we can't exorcise. And rates are rising, and forecast to rise further still.

Story continues below advertisement

“Most households can no longer afford to buy property in the top financial centres without a substantial inheritance,” UBS, the big global bank, said of world housing markets in its annual Global Real Estate Bubble Index report for 2018.

Vancouver and Toronto rank in the top four of that index.

Both cities have been the target of federal and provincial measures, notably the commercial bank regulator’s new Canada-wide mortgage-qualification rules that came into effect in January, and taxes and other moves in British Columbia and Ontario.

Vancouver remains a question mark, but economists believe other markets have stabilized, bringing the hoped-for soft landing for the housing sector.

As The Globe and Mail’s Brent Jang reports, the Vancouver area market has slumped, with sales falling in August to a six-year low and prices down from their peak.

Of course, you’ve got to put that into perspective: The average price for a detached home in the City of Vancouver may have plunged 19 per cent from the peak in April, 2016, but it’s still $2.5-million.

The Toronto area market, in turn, is springing back, with August marking the third month in a row that sales rose on a year-over-year comparison. Average prices dipped in August from July when you adjust for seasonal factors, but were up 4.7 per cent from a year earlier, as The Globe and Mail’s Janet McFarland reports.

Story continues below advertisement

Many cities in the UBS study are in "overvalued territory," the bank said.

But "bubble risk appears greatest in Hong Kong, Munich, Toronto, Vancouver, London and Amsterdam," it added.

"Major imbalances also characterize Stockholm, Paris, San Francisco, Frankfurt and Sydney."

Here's a look at the issues:


"Vancouver, whose house prices accelerated to a double-digit rate relative to last year, has a ballooning index score," UBS said.

"In both cities, valuations have trended upward since the late 1990s,” the bank said of Vancouver and Toronto, though both have recently been affected by the new mortgage rules.

Story continues below advertisement

"Rising rates, stricter market regulations or an economic downturn could turn the lights out on the party given the high valuations and strained affordability,” UBS said.

Higher mortgage rates and new regulations should ease Toronto's rise, the bank said, but the soft Canadian dollar could again draw foreign purchasers.

In Vancouver, income gains and rent increases have "mitigated" the housing market imbalances.

"As the government tries to contain speculation, the tax burden is rising for high-end property buyers and foreign purchasers," it added.


Royal Bank of Canada’s latest quarterly study is like something out of Nightmare on Elm Street.

And it just so happens that on Vancouver's Elm Street, there's a home for sale at $6.5-million. Okay, it's got a pool, but still.

Story continues below advertisement

"Affordability is a major issue in two of Canada’s largest markets," RBC chief economist Craig Wright and senior economist Robert Hogue said in their report.

“It’s at crisis levels in Vancouver and poses a tremendous challenge for many Toronto-area buyers despite improving in the past two quarters.”

Many other markets have seen "modest deterioration" in affordability, but juggling ownership is "in line with historical norms" if you exclude Vancouver, Victoria and Toronto.

RBC’s study looked at how much the percentage of pretax income needed to cover ownership costs in the first quarter.

In Vancouver, it's a horror show, at 87.8 per cent. Then comes Toronto at 74.2, Montreal at 43.7, Calgary at 43, Ottawa at 36.6 and Edmonton at 28. The national measure is 48.4.

And here's the sequel: "The prospect of more interest rate hikes in the period ahead poses material risk of further affordability erosion in Canada. The odds of this ultimately occurring will also depend on the degree to which household income increases."

Story continues below advertisement

UBS, too, noted that in Vancouver, "the already strained affordability will become an acute issue if mortgage rates rise further."


There have to be some people who are in so far over their heads that they fear they won't part with their banks until they die.

Certainly, many seniors are now struggling with debts after retirement, though overall credit growth is slowing, and the Bank of Canada is less antsy about how much we owe.

Having said that, the key measure of credit market debt as a percentage of disposable income rose in the second quarter to 169.1 per cent, which means we owe $1.69 for every dollar of disposable income.

And, of course, interest rates are on the rise. Indeed, we're likely to see the central bank raise its benchmark rate again later this month.

“Households’ debt service costs rose to 14.2 per cent of incomes in the second quarter, the highest since 2008,” noted Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist at Capital Economics, and his colleagues, senior Canada economist Stephen Brown and assistant economist Nikhil Sanghani.

Story continues below advertisement

They were referring to the household debt service ratio, which measures principal and interest payments against disposable income. And note that mortgage and interest payments top those of principal.

"Moreover, policy rate hikes over the past year have yet to fully feed through to borrowing costs, and the Bank of Canada will probably raise interest rates twice more over the next six months," the Capital Economics analysts said in a recent report.

"That will squeeze households further and push the debt service ratio up to a record high. That, in turn, will weigh on household spending growth and the housing market in the coming years."

Then, as The Globe and Mail's Rob Carrick writes, home equity lines of credit, or HELOCs, have become a norm in Canada.

And, the latest look at balances by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. shows, we're up to our necks in British Columbia, our shoulders on the Prairies, our elbows in Ontario and Quebec, and our waists east of there.


The latest results from the mortgage insurance sector, led by CMHC, threw up no red flags.

(We’re switching here from horror flicks to disaster movies.)

Indeed, “CMHC’s (and its peers’) mortgage insurance loss ratio increased year over year, but remains low in our view,” RBC analyst Geoffrey Kwan said of the second quarter.

“Industry loss/delinquency trends continue to be favourable, and suggest we are in a housing slowdown (not a downturn), but we recognize the risks to the housing/mortgage market are higher than one year ago,” he added.

“Focal point cities of Toronto and Vancouver continue to see positive employment and economic growth trends, which is important as they comprise close to 50 per cent of the dollar value of residential real estate transacted in Canada.”

Notably, Mr. Kwan pointed out, CMHC’s second-quarter delinquency rate, at 0.27 per cent, was down two basis points from a year earlier, while the “severity ratio” came in at 29.1 per cent, up 1.6 percentage points from a year earlier, though down 2.8 points from the previous quarter.

The severity ratio looks at claims paid related to original loan amounts, according to CMHC.

So, a declining percentage shows claims falling against the value of insured mortgages, and a rising measure shows claims climbing as a percentage of starting loan amounts, the agency said.

Today, CMHC released the results of stress tests that confirmed “its ability to weather severe but extremely unlikely scenarios.”

The 2018 version of the annual tests showed its capital levels could withstand financial stress, sustained low crude prices, a global trade war, a cyberattack on Canadian financial institutions, an earthquake and a major volcanic eruption, the agency said.

Read more

Markets at a glance

Read more

LNG project gets go-ahead

A $40-billion liquefied natural gas project in British Columbia has been given the green light by its owners in what will be the largest private-sector investment in the province’s history, The Globe and Mail’s Brent Jang reports.

The project led by Royal Dutch Shell PLC calls for an export terminal to be built in Kitimat on the West Coast.

Exports from the LNG Canada terminal will be shipped to Asia.

Read more
More news
Inside the Market
In case you missed it

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies