Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

Canadians spent an average of 24 minutes travelling to work in 2016, but a new poll says only 12 per cent of those surveyed are willing to commute for longer than 15 minutes daily post-pandemic.

iStockPhoto / Getty Images

After more than a year of working from home, many Canadians aren’t ready to give up on the benefits of avoiding the commute to work.

According to a recent study conducted by Angus Reid on behalf of flexible workspace provider International Workplace Group (IWG), nearly a third of Canadians want a commute of no more than 15 minutes. Another 22 per cent want to work entirely from home, and nearly 40 per cent want a hybrid mode that blends in person and remote work. Over all, only 12 per cent of the more than 1,500 employed Canadian respondents are willing to travel more than 15 minutes to work on a daily basis.

According to Statistics Canada, Canadians spent an average of 24 minutes travelling to work in 2016, with more than 850,000 workers dedicating over an hour to travelling in each direction every day.

Story continues below advertisement

“People want to eliminate the commute for work that is not purpose-driven,” says Wayne Berger, chief executive officer of the Americas for IWG. “They want the ability to structure their days, or where they need to be each day, based on what’s required.”

The shift in attitude toward commuting represents a significant departure from a long-standing norm that dictated everything from how businesses operate to how cities are designed.

“This presents an opportunity for cities and provinces and municipalities to start rethinking urbanization,” Mr. Berger says. “It will help alleviate the stress on a taxed infrastructure and an overextended public transit system.”

Growing demand for a commute of 15-minutes or less validates a concept that has long been championed by city planners and developers. Many – including Toronto’s former chief city planner and founder of Markee Developments, Jennifer Keesmaat – have promoted the concept of neighbourhoods that provide its residents with all of their basic needs within walking or biking distance.

“The long commute was an unintended consequence of poor city design and auto-oriented sprawl,” she says. “What happened during COVID is many people were able to continue to work without having the long commute, and it raised the possibility in our imaginations and our minds that it was possible to live and work without a long commute.”

Ms. Keesmaat is one of 100 prominent Canadians who signed a Declaration for Resilience in Canadian Cities in 2020, urging Canadian governments to use the pandemic as an opportunity to rethink urban design. One of the declaration’s 20 recommendations includes a commitment to the creation of 15-minute neighbourhoods “in which it is possible to live, work, shop, and age in place,” according to the declaration.

The benefits of reducing commuting times for Canadians are many, says Ms. Keesmaat, ranging from lowering greenhouse gas emissions to less spending on infrastructure, to providing individuals more free time and a better overall quality of life.

Story continues below advertisement

“It’s about transitioning to creating communities that are more complete, that have sufficient density, a mix of uses, and a mix of housing types that allow a variety of things to be done within 15 minutes of home,” she says. “As opposed to the traditional suburban model where you can’t do anything within 15 minutes of home.”

The demand for less commuting time also comes at a particularly opportune time for workers. In recent months employers have struggled to hire and retain talent, adding extra weight to employee demands. In fact, 29 per cent of respondents to the IWG study said they would look for another job if they are required to commute five days a week.

“The war for talent is very real, and has heated up,” says TJ Schmaltz, the chief people and legal officer of Prospera Credit Union and chair of the board of Chartered Professionals in Human Resources (CPHR) Canada. “A number of our employees in B.C. have said ‘If you ask me to come back to work full-time, or back to that normal schedule, I’ll look to go somewhere else,’ and I’ve heard that from our membership across Canada.”

Mr. Schmaltz warns, however, that there is often a mismatch between employee expectations and what employers are willing to offer in terms of flexibility.

“There are employees that say, ‘flexibility means I can work from home regularly, but also will come into the office and will have my designated desk or office available to me when I want it,’” he says. “In the future, employers are going to have to find the balance of, ‘we can give you flexibility, but that cuts both ways,’ and you might be looking at more shared space, or hotel space, when you’re in they office.”

Mr. Schmaltz says employees need to be realistic and understand that the level of flexibility they demand may not be compatible with the business’s needs. At the same time he warns employers to take such demands seriously, as flexibility and the ability to reduce commuting time is emerging as a key employee demand in a highly competitive hiring landscape.

Story continues below advertisement

Stay ahead in your career. We have a weekly Careers newsletter to give you guidance and tips on career management, leadership, business education and more. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies