Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Sean Mullin is the Executive Director and Creig Lamb is a Senior Policy Advisor at the Brookfield Institute for Innovation + Entrepreneurship, which has recently studied the impact of automation on Canada’s work force.

In June, Manulife Financial Corp. announced plans to cut roughly 700 Canadian jobs as the company automates and consolidates its operations. This move is part of a broader trend in the finance sector, as companies rapidly embrace new digital technologies to remain competitive and meet the ever-growing consumer demands for fast, convenient and personalized digital services – in particular as emerging fintechs chip away at the business models of the large players.

While automation is not sector specific, and its implications are felt throughout the economy, the finance and insurance sectors provide an illustrative example that can help Canadians unpack what these recent trends mean for companies and workers.

Story continues below advertisement

With each highly publicized layoff resulting from automation, concerns of a jobless future always seem to rise to the forefront. However, despite recent advances in artificial intelligence, automation isn’t a new phenomenon; each successive wave of automation has served to improve productivity, enhance living standards and ultimately create more jobs than it eliminates in the long run. But to be sure, as with the Manulife employees slated to lose their jobs, this process can be disruptive for certain workers in certain industries or regions.

For Canada and the world’s economy, automation presents a “dual challenge.” On the one hand, there is the need to embrace technology and automation to maintain competitiveness and productivity; on the other, is the equally pressing need to mitigate the potentially negative impacts for certain workers.

The Manulife story is indicative of an emerging trend unfolding in Canada’s finance and insurance sector, and the economy writ large. To remain competitive, and ultimately preserve jobs, Canadian companies need to embrace technology or risk being rendered obsolete.

To date, our financial services companies have lagged behind peer jurisdictions when it comes to the use of technology – in 2013, total investment per worker in the information and communication technologies sector across Canada was 79.2 per cent of the U.S. total. Yet, changing consumer demands, increasing competition from fintechs and other global competitors, and the opportunity to develop new business models that utilize new sources of consumer data are increasing pressures on these companies to accelerate their uptake of technology.

As Manulife Canada president and CEO Michael Doughty said, “our industry has not kept pace with this change.” Increased tech adoption, he said, is necessary “to ensure we remain competitive and make it easier for customers to do business with us.”

As a result, to guarantee the continued prosperity, we need to encourage tech adoption, in the finance and insurance sector and across the economy.

Automation is not always a job killer. As job tasks once performed by humans are automated, demand for workers to perform new roles where they have a comparative advantage can increase, along with skill requirements.

Story continues below advertisement

In the finance and insurance sector, aggregate employment has gone up, not down. Between 2002 and 2016, employment in Ontario’s finance and insurance sector (representing about half of the jobs in Canada in the sector) grew by 35 per cent or 85,350 workers.

Automation has, however, contributed to a demand for different skills, lowering the need for transactional tasks and increasing demand for both soft and technical skills, including those related to client experience, sales, project and risk management, as well as software development and data analysis. For workers in the sector, adapting to technological change will more than likely require gaining new skills above and beyond what technology is capable of performing.

However, in the short and medium term, automation can be disruptive for certain workers, in particular, those who are unable to acquire the skills necessary to adapt. While the 700 Manulife employees represent only about 2 per cent of the more than 44,000 new finance and insurance jobs that were added across Canada between 2016 and 2017, the impacts of automation on these workers and their families can be devastating.

To mitigate the negative implications of automation, we need to ensure that these most vulnerable employees have the necessary skills to adapt to these changes and thrive. And this isn’t just a challenge for our universities and colleges – everyone has a role to play from employers to the broader public and non-profit sectors. Recognizing the need to support workers through this transition, Manulife has stated that it will be focusing on hiring and retraining employees across Canada, concentrating particularly on technology skills.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies